Abstract:In many work and decision situations, realizing cooperation among individuals is important. However, decision making environments of individuals are far from stable, resulting in changes in task complexity and the social settings they encounter. We argue that past experiences with cooperative behavior can result in different cooperative norms and expectations about the behavior of others and will have an effect on an individual's subsequent behavior in new situations. This study experimentally investigates these dynamics of cooperative behavior in social dilemmas and addresses the role of communication to provide empirical evidence about a cognitive mechanism that may lead to these spillovers. Specifically, the experimental design randomly assigns subjects to one type of repetitive interactions in the first social dilemma (single partner or different partners) and we then examine how this impacts the propensity to behave cooperatively in subsequent social dilemmas with unfamiliar partners (either single or different). Because of the variety in complexity of decision-making environments in practice, we do so by examining behavioral spillovers across three different social dilemmas that vary in difficulty to make cooperation successful. Our findings show that individuals cooperate more during initial interactions with a single partner. More importantly, this has positive spillover effects for subsequent behavior and communication, even to settings without repeated interactions with a single partner. However, environmental conditions affect the ability to transfer established norms of cooperation to subsequent interactions, as an initially learned cooperative norm is gradually replaced by a more competitive attitude when individuals start to interact with unfamiliar others in a setting in which cooperative success is more difficult to achieve. Our findings illustrate the power of repeated interactions for establishing and sustaining cooperation in other settings and enhance understanding of how cooperative decisions can be shaped by both incentives and the broader behavioral context of individuals.

Is it what you say or how you say it?

Differences in Cooperation Between Social Dilemmas of Gain and Loss

Promises and cooperation: Evidence from a TV game show

Self-Conscious or Fear of Hurting Another’s Feeling? An Experimental Investigation on Promise-Keeping

The Effects of Communication and Commitment in a Public Goods Social Dilemma

The effect of communication modality on cooperation in online environments

Relinquishing Control Promotes Cooperative Behavior by Positive Social Judgments in Adolescents

Leadership in a social dilemma: Does it matter if the leader is pro‐social or just says they are pro‐social?

Malleable Lies: Communication and Cooperation in a High Stakes TV Game Show

Promoting Cooperation In Social Dilemmas: An Interplay Between Motives And Distribution Of Resources

Intragroup communication in social dilemmas: An artefactual public good field experiment in small-scale communities

Exploring the Inducement for Social Dilemma and Cooperation Promotion Mechanisms in Structured Populations

Onymity Promotes Cooperation in Social Dilemma Experiments

How Committed Individuals Shape Social Dynamics: A Survey on Coordination Games and Social Dilemma Games

Dynamic influences on cooperation in a social dilemma: How type of experience and communication affect behavioral spillovers

Lavish Returns on Cheap Talk: Two-way Communication in Trust Games

Self-Serving Dishonesty Partially Substitutes Fairness in Motivating Cooperation When People Are Treated Fairly

Effective Strategies and Psychological Mechanisms for Cooperation Induction in Social Dilemmas: A Review and Future Research

Cooperation and Control in Multiplayer Social Dilemmas

Misrepresentation of group contributions undermines conditional cooperation in a human decision making experiment

Impact of Keeping Silence on Spatial Reciprocity in Spatial Games.