Abstract:The electromagnetic and axial form factors of the nucleon and its lowest positive parity excitations, the Delta(1232) and the N*(1440), are calculated with constituent-quark models that are specified by simple algebraic representations of the mass-operator eigenstates. Poincaré covariant current operators are generated by the dynamics from single-quark currents that are covariant under a kinematic subgroup. The dependence of the calculated form factors on the choice of kinematics and on the gross features of the wave functions is illustrated for instant-form, point-form, and front-form kinematics. A simple algebraic form of the orbital ground state wave function, which depends on two parameters, allows a fair description of all the form factors over the empirically accessible range, although with widely different choices of the parameters, which determine the range and shape of the orbital wave function. The neutron electric form factor requires additional features, for instance the presence of mixed symmetry S-state component with 1 -- 2 % probability in the ground state wave function. Instant and front form kinematics demand a spatially extended wave function, whereas in point form kinematics the form factors may be described with a quite compact wave function.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

### Problems the paper attempts to solve This paper aims to explore the dependence of the electromagnetic and axial form factors of baryons (such as nucleons and their lowest positive - parity excited states \(\Delta(1232)\) and \(N(1440)\)) on different kinematic forms. Specifically, the authors use a constituent quark model specified by eigenstates of the mass operator represented by simple algebra and dynamically generate Poincaré - covariant current operators. These current operators are generated from single - quark currents that are covariant under specific dynamical subgroups. ### Main research contents 1. **Influence of different kinematic forms**: - The influence of instantaneous - form, point - form and front - form kinematics on the calculation of form factors is studied. - How different kinematic choices affect the spatial extensiveness of wave functions is explored. 2. **Wave function parameterization**: - A simple algebraic form is used to represent the orbital ground - state wave function, which depends on two parameters and can well describe the variation of all form factors within the experimentally accessible range. - Research on the neutron electric form factor has found that it is necessary to introduce a probability - mixed symmetric S - state component of about 1 - 2% to obtain a better description. 3. **Quark current structure**: - The same unstructured spinor current is used throughout, and the relationships between quark velocities in different kinematic forms are discussed, which depend on the selected kinematic form. ### Goals Through the above methods, the paper attempts to understand and explain the following problems: - The specific influence of different kinematic forms on baryon elastic and transition form factors. - How the spatial extensiveness and shape of wave functions affect the calculation results of form factors. - How to obtain results consistent with experimental data within different kinematic frameworks by adjusting the parameters of wave functions. ### Conclusions The research shows that although different kinematic forms can lead to significant qualitative and quantitative differences, through appropriate selection of wave function parameters, good consistency with experimental data can be achieved in various situations. In particular, for the neutron electric form factor, introducing a small amount of mixed - symmetric S - state component can significantly improve the description effect. In addition, instantaneous and front - form kinematics require wave functions to have large spatial extensiveness, while point - form kinematics allows the use of relatively compact wave functions. --- If you have further questions or need more detailed explanations, please feel free to let us know!

Baryon Form Factors of Relativistic Constituent-Quark Models

Lattice Calculation Of Baryonic Electromagnetic Form-Factors

Electromagnetic Form Factors of the Nucleon in an Improved Quark Model

Nucleon and Δ Elastic and Transition Form Factors

Survey of Nucleon Electromagnetic Form Factors

Form factors of the nucleon axial current

Form factors of in a covariant quark-diquark approach

Nucleon and $${\delta}$$ Δ Elastic and Transition Form Factors

Δ-baryon Axialvector and Pseudoscalar Form Factors, and Associated PCAC Relations

Nucleon and Roper Electromagnetic Elastic and Transition Form Factors

Electromagnetic Form Factors of the Bound Nucleon

Nucleon Form Factors in Point-Form Spectator-Model Constructions

Regarding Proton Form Factors

Nucleon-to- Axial and Pseudoscalar Transition Form Factors

Nucleon Form Factors and A Nonpointlike Diquark

Nucleon Electromagnetic and Axial Form Factors in a Light-front Constituent Quark Model

Nucleon elastic form factors at accessible large spacelike momenta

[A case of signet-ring cell carcinoma of the urinary bladder].

From quarks and gluons to baryon form factors

Form Factors and Dyson-Schwinger Equations

Nucleon shape and electromagnetic form factors in the chiral constituent quark model