Astronomy and the Fall of Babylon

V.G.Gurzadyan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.physics/0311114
2003-11-24
Abstract:This illustrated article represents a popular account of the study of the Babylonian astronomical records of Enuma Anu Enlil tablet series i.e. of the Venus Tablet of Ammisaduqa and of two lunar eclipses linked with the IIIrd dynasty of Ur, having resulted in the proposal of Ultra-Low chronology of the Near East in II millennium B.C. The emerged Ultra-Low chronology is by 96 years shorter than the conventional Middle chronology and by now is supported by various independent studies. Tables of relative chronologies of principal kingdoms of Mesopotamia are given, along with some dates associated with the fall of Babylon in II millennium B.C. The technical details are given in the book by <a class="link-external link-http" href="http://H.Gasche" rel="external noopener nofollow">this http URL</a>, <a class="link-external link-http" href="http://J.A.Armstrong" rel="external noopener nofollow">this http URL</a>, <a class="link-external link-http" href="http://S.W.Cole" rel="external noopener nofollow">this http URL</a> and <a class="link-external link-http" href="http://V.G.Gurzadyan" rel="external noopener nofollow">this http URL</a>, "Dating the Fall of Babylon" (Mesopotamian History and Environment, Series II, University of Ghent and Chicago Press, 1998) and in subsequent articles.
History and Philosophy of Physics
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is to accurately determine the absolute chronology of ancient Babylonian historical events through astronomical methods, especially the time when Babylon was conquered by the Hittites. Specifically, the author attempts to correct and verify the traditional Middle Chronology by analyzing ancient astronomical records (such as the Venus tablets and lunar eclipse records), and to solve the problem of pottery chronology in archaeology. ### Main problems 1. **The specific time when Babylon was conquered by the Hittites**: Traditionally, the time when Babylon was conquered by the Hittites is controversial. There are mainly three different chronologies (High, Middle, and Low), which date this event to 1651 BC, 1595 BC, and 1531 BC respectively. The author hopes to determine a more accurate date through astronomical data. 2. **The reliability of the Venus tablets**: The Venus tablets have long been used to calculate the historical chronology of early Babylon, but there are errors and unclear points in its data. The author attempts to verify the validity of these data and explore whether reliable time information can be extracted from them. 3. **The use of lunar eclipse records**: By analyzing two lunar eclipse records related to the Third Dynasty of Ur, the author attempts to find astronomical phenomena corresponding to historical events, thereby providing a more accurate chronology framework for Babylonian history. ### Solutions - **Re - evaluate the Venus tablets**: The author re - evaluated the Venus tablets using modern statistical methods (such as Monte Carlo simulation) and found that the data therein has a large amount of noise and cannot provide reliable chronology information. - **Analyze lunar eclipse records**: Through detailed analysis of the two lunar eclipse records during the Third Dynasty of Ur, combined with modern astronomical calculations, the author successfully found lunar eclipse events that match the historical description, and calculated that the time when Babylon was conquered by the Hittites was 1499 BC. - **Combine pottery evidence**: The author's work also solved the pottery chronology problem proposed by the archaeologist Gasche, proving that the chronology framework after shortening the Middle Chronology by about a century is more consistent with the archaeological evidence. ### Conclusions By combining astronomy, archaeology, and historical documents, the author proposed a new absolute chronology system, setting the time when Babylon was conquered by the Hittites to 1499 BC, which is 96 years later than the traditional Middle Chronology. This result not only corrects the chronology framework of Babylonian history, but also affects the historical chronologies of other Near - Eastern kingdoms (such as Elam, Hittite, Levant, and ancient Egypt).