Abstract:Geophysical data rarely show any smoothness at any scale, and this often makes comparison with theoretical model output difficult. However, highly fluctuating signals and fractal structures are typical of open dissipative systems with nonlinear dynamics, the focus of most geophysical research. High levels of variability are excited over a large range of scales by the combined actions of external forcing and internal instability. At very small scales we expect geophysical fields to be smooth, but these are rarely resolved with available instrumentation or simulation tools; nondifferentiable and even discontinuous models are therefore in order. We need methods of statistically analyzing geophysical data, whether measured in situ, remotely sensed or even generated by a computer model, that are adapted to these characteristics. An important preliminary task is to define statistically stationary features in generally nonstationary signals. We first discuss a simple criterion for stationarity in finite data streams that exhibit power law energy spectra and then, guided by developments in turbulence studies, we advocate the use of two ways of analyzing the scale dependence of statistical information: singular measures and qth order structure functions. In nonstationary situations, the approach based on singular measures seeks power law behavior in integrals over all possible scales of a nonnegative stationary field derived from the data, leading to a characterization of the intermittency in this (gradient‐related) field. In contrast, the approach based on structure functions uses the signal itself, seeking power laws for the statistical moments of absolute increments over arbitrarily large scales, leading to a characterization of the prevailing nonstationarity in both quantitative and qualitative terms. We explain graphically, step by step, both multifractal statistics which are largely complementary to each other. The geometrical manifestations of nonstationarity and intermittency, “roughness” and “sparseness”, respectively, are illustrated and the associated analytical (differentiability and continuity) properties are discussed. As an example, the two techniques are applied to a series of recent measurements of liquid water distributions inside marine stratocumulus decks; these are found to be multifractal over scales ranging from ≈60 m to ≈60 km. Finally, we define the “mean multifractal plane” and show it to be a simple yet comprehensive tool with many applications including data intercomparison, (dynamical or stochastic) model and retrieval validations.

Fractal rain distributions and chaotic advection

Rain, power laws, and advection

Review: Fractal Geometry in Precipitation

A Complexity View of Rainfall

Hamiltonian fractals and chaotic scattering of passive particles by a topographical vortex and an alternating current

Fractal powers in Serrin's swirling vortex solutions

Stochastic Theory of the Size Distribution of Raindrops

Rain: Relaxations in the sky

Universal Inverse Power law distribution for Fractal Fluctuations in Dynamical Systems: Applications for Predictability of Inter - annual Variability of Indian and USA Region Rainfall

A General Systems Theory for Atmospheric Flows and Atmospheric Aerosol Size Distribution

Multifractal characterizations of nonstationarity and intermittency in geophysical fields: Observed, retrieved, or simulated

Precipitation, dynamical intermittency, and sporadic randomness

Fractal dynamics analysis of the VHF radiation pulses during initial breakdown process of lightning

A global analysis of the fractal properties of clouds revealing anisotropy of turbulence across scales

Universal Quantification for Self-Organized Criticality in Atmospheric Flows

Turbulent Flows Are Not Uniformly Multifractal

Generic Generation of Noise-Driven Chaos in Stochastic Time Delay Systems: Bridging the Gap with High-End Simulations

An explanation of scale‐dependent dispersivity in heterogeneous aquifers using concepts of fractal geometry

Raindrop Deformation in Turbulence

The Fractality of the Hydrodynamic Modes of Diffusion

Galerkin Eigenvector Approximations