Eric van der Swaluw,Turlough P. Downes
Abstract:We present a model of a pulsar-driven supernova remnant, by using a hydrodynamics code, which simulates the evolution of a pulsar wind nebula when the pulsar is moving at a high velocity through its expanding supernova remnant. The simulation shows four different stages of the pulsar wind nebula: the supersonic expansion stage, the reverse shock interaction stage, the subsonic expansion stage and ultimately the bow shock stage. Due to the high velocity of the pulsar, the position of the pulsar is located at the head of the pulsar wind bubble, after the passage of the reverse shock. The resulting morphology of the pulsar wind bubble is therefore similar to the morphology of a bow shock pulsar wind nebula. We show how to distinguish these two different stages, and apply this method to the SNR G327.1-1.1, for which we argue that there is no bow shock around its pulsar wind nebula.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is to understand the morphological evolution of the pulsar wind nebula (PWN) driven by a high - speed pulsar in its supernova remnant (SNR). Specifically, the author studies the morphology and evolution stages of the pulsar wind nebula through hydrodynamic simulations when the pulsar passes through its expanding supernova remnant at a high relative velocity.
### Main problems:
1. **Morphological evolution of the pulsar wind nebula**: The author hopes to understand how the morphology of the pulsar wind nebula changes when the pulsar is in high - speed motion. In particular, they are concerned about whether the pulsar wind nebula will form a bow shock, and the relationship between this morphology and the position of the pulsar.
2. **Distinguishing different evolution stages**: Through simulations, the author attempts to distinguish different evolution stages of the pulsar wind nebula, including the supersonic expansion stage, the reverse - shock interaction stage, the subsonic expansion stage, and the final bow - shock stage. What are the characteristics of these stages? How can these stages be identified through observational data?
3. **Application to specific astrophysical systems**: The author applies their model to the specific supernova remnant G327.1 - 1.1, to explore whether the pulsar wind nebula in this system has formed a bow shock, and to explain why no bow shock has been observed.
### Key formulas:
1. **Arrival time of the reverse shock**:
\[
t_{\text{rev}} = 1045 E_{51}^{-1/2} \left( \frac{M_{ej}}{M_\odot} \right)^{5/6} n_0^{-1/3} \, \text{years}
\]
where \(E_{51}\) is the total mechanical energy of the supernova remnant (in units of \(10^{51}\) ergs), \(M_{ej}\) is the ejecta mass (in units of solar mass), and \(n_0\) is the ambient hydrogen number density (in units of \(2.34\times 10^{-24} \, \text{g/cm}^3\)).
2. **Traversal time**:
\[
t_{cr} \simeq 1.4\times 10^4 E_{51}^{1/3} V_{1000}^{-5/3} n_0^{-1/3} \, \text{years}
\]
where \(V_{1000}\) is the velocity of the pulsar (in units of 1000 km/s).
### Conclusion:
Through simulations, the author finds that when the pulsar passes through its supernova remnant at a high speed, the position of the pulsar will deviate from the center of the pulsar wind nebula, especially after the reverse shock passes. If the position of the pulsar satisfies \(R_{psr}/R_{snr} \geq 0.677\) and the age is greater than half of the traversal time, the pulsar wind nebula may form a bow shock. However, for the supernova remnant G327.1 - 1.1, the author concludes that the pulsar wind nebula in this system has not yet formed a bow shock.
Through these studies, the author provides a method to distinguish different evolution stages of the pulsar wind nebula and provides a theoretical basis for interpreting observational data of similar astrophysical systems.