Leptogenesis from Supersymmetry Breaking

Yuval Grossman,Tamar Kashti,Yosef Nir,Esteban Roulet

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.251801

2003-08-18

Abstract:We show that soft supersymmetry breaking terms involving the heavy sneutrinos can lead to sneutrino-antisneutrino mixing and to new sources of CP violation, which are present even if a single generation is considered. These terms are naturally present in supersymmetric versions of leptogenesis scenarios, and they induce indirect CP violation in the decays of the heavy sneutrinos, eventually generating a baryon asymmetry. This new contribution can be comparable to or even dominate over the asymmetry produced in traditional leptogenesis scenarios.

High Energy Physics - Phenomenology

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The main problem that this paper attempts to solve is to evaluate and compare the shapes of galaxy luminosity functions (LF) measured in different redshift surveys, especially how these luminosity functions vary with galaxy types and filters. Specifically, the author analyzes the optical luminosity functions by systematically measuring the Schechter parameters \(M^*\) and \(\alpha\), and converts all existing measurement results into the UBVR cIc Johnson - Cousins system for homogeneous comparison.

### Specific aspects of the main problem:

1. **Differences in the morphology of luminosity functions**:
- The author has studied the morphology of luminosity functions of different types of galaxies (such as elliptical galaxies, lenticular galaxies, spiral galaxies, etc.) under different filters.
- By comparing these morphologies, the author has explored the changes in luminosity functions in different survey investigations and their reasons.

2. **Influence of classification criteria**:
- Different survey investigations have used different galaxy classification criteria (such as visual morphological classification, spectral classification, color classification, etc.), which has led to significant differences in luminosity functions.
- The author specifically points out that inaccurate spectral photometric calibration may lead to type contamination, causing a smooth change in the luminosity function, which may have little to do with the intrinsic luminosity function.

3. **Interference from dwarf galaxies**:
- Many existing redshift surveys have failed to correctly measure the Gaussian luminosity function of spiral galaxies, probably due to the interference from dwarf galaxies.
- Similarly, surveys based on visual morphological classification also show that the luminosity functions of elliptical / lenticular galaxies may be contaminated by dwarf galaxies.

4. **Importance of reliable classification**:
- The author emphasizes the importance of reliable spectral classification based on multi - slit spectroscopy or intermediate - filter spectro - photometry and precise CCD photometry for measuring the Gaussian luminosity function of E/S0 galaxies.
- This method can more accurately separate relevant giant and dwarf galaxy types, thereby obtaining a reliable intrinsic luminosity function.

### Solutions and suggestions:

- **More consistent classification methods**: In order to measure reliable intrinsic luminosity functions, it is necessary to more consistently separate giant and dwarf galaxy types.
- **Improved classification techniques**: Using multi - fiber spectroscopy, multi - slit spectroscopy or intermediate - filter spectro - photometry combined with precise CCD photometry can improve the accuracy of classification.
- **Data standardization**: Convert all measurement results into a unified luminosity system (such as the Johnson - Cousins system) to ensure the consistency and reliability of comparison.

Through the above analysis, the author aims to reveal the differences in luminosity functions in different survey investigations and the reasons behind them, and provide directions for improvement for future research.