Abstract:It is widely known now that scholarly communication is in crisis, resting on an academic publishing model that is unsustainable. One response to this crisis has been the emergence of Open Access (OA) publishing, bringing scholarly literature out from behind a paywall and making it freely available to anyone online. Many research and academic libraries are facilitating the change to OA by establishing institutional repositories, supporting OA policies, and hosting OA journals. In addition, research funding bodies, such as the Australian Research Council (ARC), are mandating that all published grant research outputs be made available in OA, unless legal and contractual obligations prevent this. Despite these broader changes, not all scholars are aware of the new publishing environment. In particular, the rate of adoption of OA models in the Humanities and Social Sciences (HSS) has historically been lower than Science, Technology and Medicine (STM) disciplines. Nevertheless, some local and international OA exemplars exist in HSS. At Edith Cowan University in Perth, Western Australia, the faculty-administered environmental humanities journal, Landscapes, was migrated to the institutional open access repository in 2013. Subsequently, researchers in the Faculty of Education and Arts were surveyed regarding their knowledge, understandings, and perceptions of OA publishing. The survey was also designed to elicit the barriers to OA publishing perceived or experienced by HSS researchers. This article will present the findings of our small faculty-based OA survey, with particular attention to HSS academics (and within this subject group, particular attention to the arts and humanities), their perceptions of OA, and the impediments they encounter. We argue that OA publishing will continue to transform scholarship within the arts and humanities, especially through the role of institutional repositories. The “library-as-publisher” role offers the potential to transform academic and university-specific publishing activities. However, the ongoing training of university researchers and personnel is required to bring into balance their understandings of OA publisher and the demands of the broader Australian and international research environment.

The Open Language Archives Community: An infrastructure for distributed archiving of language resources

Access Interfaces for Open Archival Information Systems based on the OAI-PMH and the OpenURL Framework for Context-Sensitive Services

Born Archival: The Ebb and Flow of Digital Documents from the Field

The Archives Unleashed Project: Technology, Process, and Community to Improve Scholarly Access to Web Archives

Defining an Open Access Resource Strategy for Research Libraries: Part I—The Coming Main Streamlization of Open Access Resources?

Digital cultural heritage standards: from silo to semantic web

Beyond the Boundaries of Open, Closed and Pirate Archives: Lessons from a Hybrid Approach

Providing Digital Infrastructure for Audio-Visual Linguistic Research Data with Diverse Usage Scenarios: Lessons Learnt

A Web-Based Resource Model for eScience: Object Reuse & Exchange

Creating Structure in Web Archives With Collections: Different Concepts From Web Archivists

Equality, findability, sustainability: the challenges and rewards of open digital humanities data

Statistical properties of periodic orbits in 4-disk billiard system: pruning-proof property

Archives in action. The impact of digital technology on archaeological recording strategies and ensuing open research archives

Comprehensiveness of Archives: A Modern AI-enabled Approach to Build Comprehensive Shared Cultural Heritage

A Summary of the First Workshop on Language Technology for Language Documentation and Revitalization

Evaluating the Linguistic Coverage of OpenAlex: An Assessment of Metadata Accuracy and Completeness

Building Better: Avoiding Pitfalls in Developing Language Resources when Data is Scarce

Landscapes of Research: Perceptions of Open Access (OA) Publishing in the Arts and Humanities

Not always about you: Prioritizing community needs when developing endangered language technology

Open Archives Initiative protocol development and implementation at arXiv

Open is not forever: A study of vanished open access journals