Mukunda P. Das,Frederick Green
Abstract:We review the conceptual structure of the Landauer theory of electron transport in the light of quantum kinetics, the orthodox framework for describing conductance at all scales. In a straightforward analysis, we assess popular claims for a rational link between Landauer theory on the one hand, and orthodox microscopics on the other. The need to explicitly include inelastic (dissipative) carrier relaxation is key to any well-posed microscopic model of open-system mesoscopic transport.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
### What problems does this paper attempt to solve?
This paper mainly explores the conceptual structure of the Landauer formula in mesoscopic physics and its relationship with the standard microscopic theory. Specifically, the author attempts to solve the following key problems:
1. **Limitations of the Landauer formula**:
- The Landauer theory describes electron transport in an elastic scattering environment and cannot directly explain the energy dissipation mechanism. Although the Landauer theory must satisfy the fluctuation - dissipation theorem (Johnson - Nyquist theorem), its core assumption is dissipation - free elastic transport.
- The paper points out that the Landauer formula has deficiencies in dealing with actual material parameters and contact effects, especially when explaining experimental results.
2. **Consistency of microscopic theories**:
- The paper attempts to establish the connection between the Landauer formula and standard microscopic theories (such as quantum dynamics, Boltzmann equation, etc.). The author emphasizes that the Landauer formula should be regarded as a highly idealized special case rather than a general transport model.
- By introducing the Kubo formula and other microscopic methods, the author shows how to understand transport phenomena, including dissipation processes, within a more complete framework.
3. **Experimental verification and theoretical consistency**:
- The paper discusses the quantization of conductivity observed in experiments and analyzes the deviations between these phenomena and the predictions of the Landauer formula. In particular, the author questions the differences between two - terminal and four - terminal measurement results and the impact of these differences on transport theory.
- The author cites the experiments of de Picciotto et al. and van Wees et al., pointing out that even under nearly ideal ballistic transport conditions, the contact resistance is still significant, indicating that the Landauer formula may have overlooked some important physical effects.
4. **Nature of the transport mechanism**:
- The paper explores the dissipation mechanism in ballistic transport channels. Although the Landauer formula assumes that the transport is completely elastic, dissipation is inevitably involved in the actual transport process. The author proposes several possible explanations, including strong scattering at the interface and the excitation of background modes.
- The author also discusses the problem of chemical potential mismatch, pointing out that this assumption is thermodynamically unreasonable and proposes an alternative explanation based on the Kubo formula.
5. **Extension of non - linear transport theory**:
- The paper emphasizes the necessity of extending the transport theory under strong - field conditions to retain all quantum effects (including many - body correlations). To this end, the author introduces the quantum dynamics method to study transport problems far from the linear response region.
### Summary
In general, this paper aims to re - examine the application of the Landauer formula in mesoscopic transport, reveal its limitations, and propose a more consistent microscopic theoretical framework to explain experimental observations. By combining methods such as quantum dynamics and the Kubo formula, the author hopes to provide a more comprehensive understanding for mesoscopic transport research.