Abstract:Gemini (dimeric) surfactants are composed of two monomeric surfactant molecules linked by a spacer chain. Their self-assembly behavior differs qualitatively from that of monomeric surfactants. We review the various theoretical attempts to account for the behavior of this new class of amphiphilic molecules.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
This paper attempts to address the significant differences in behavior and properties between Gemini surfactants and traditional monomeric surfactants. Specifically, the article mainly focuses on the following aspects:
1. **Surface behavior**:
- For Gemini surfactants with polymethylene spacer chains (denoted as m - s - m), in the saturated monolayer at the water - air interface, the dependence of the area per molecule on the spacer chain length \( s \) is non - monotonic. For example, for Gemini surfactants with a tail length \( m = 12 \), as \( s \) increases, the molecular area first increases, reaches a maximum when \( s\approx10 - 12 \), and then decreases. This phenomenon is unexpected because it is usually considered that the larger the molecule, the larger the area it should occupy.
2. **Critical micelle concentration (cmc)**:
- The cmc of Gemini surfactants is usually one or two orders of magnitude lower than that of monomeric surfactants with the same head and tail groups. For conventional monomeric surfactants, as the number of hydrocarbon groups increases, the cmc decreases monotonically. However, for m - s - m - type Gemini surfactants, the dependence of their cmc on the spacer chain length \( s \) is non - monotonic and reaches a maximum at \( s\approx4 - 6 \). Similarly, the Krafft temperature has a minimum here, and the micellization enthalpy change has a maximum here.
3. **Aggregate shape**:
- When certain parameters (such as the relative size of head and tail groups or salt concentration) are changed, the aggregate morphology of conventional surfactants will change from high curvature to low curvature (such as from spherical micelles to cylindrical micelles and then to bilayer vesicles). However, when the length of the polymethylene spacer chain of m - s - m - type Gemini surfactants is increased, the observed morphological sequence is different, for example, from cylindrical micelles to spherical micelles and then to vesicles. In addition, Gemini surfactants with short spacer chains will also form uncommon morphologies such as branched cylindrical micelles and ring - like micelles.
4. **Phase behavior**:
- In binary mixtures (surfactant - water), the spacer chain length of m - s - m - type Gemini surfactants also has an unusual influence on their phase diagrams. For example, for Gemini surfactants with a tail length \( m = 12 \), the phase diagram regions corresponding to the hexagonal phase and the lamellar phase shrink as \( s \) increases, disappear when \( s = 10 - 12 \), and reappear when \( s = 16 \). In ternary systems (water - oil - surfactant), the dependence of the size of the microemulsion (single - phase) region on \( s \) is also non - monotonic and reaches a maximum at \( s\approx10 \).
5. **Kinetic behavior**:
- Dilute Gemini surfactant micelle solutions exhibit abnormal rheological properties, such as a significant increase in viscosity and shear - thickening phenomena as the volume fraction of the surfactant increases.
Through the discussion of the above issues, the author aims to summarize the current theoretical models of Gemini surfactants and point out the knowledge gaps and key open problems in this field to promote future research work.