Abstract:We study the implications on both background and perturbation evolution of introducing a Chaplygin gas component in the universe's ingredients. We perform likelihood analyses using wide-ranging, SN1a, CMB and large scale structure observations to assess whether such a component could be a genuine alternative to a cosmological constant. We find that current data favors an adiabatic Chaplygin gas with behavior akin to a cosmological constant.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is to explore whether Chaplygin gas can be a strong candidate for dark energy. Specifically, the author studies the influence of the cosmic background and perturbation evolution by introducing the Chaplygin gas component, and uses a wide range of observational data (such as type Ia supernovae, cosmic microwave background radiation, and large - scale structures) for likelihood analysis to evaluate whether this component can be a real alternative to the cosmological constant Λ.
### Research Background
Observations in recent years (such as supernovae, cosmic microwave background radiation, and large - scale structures) indicate that the energy density of the universe is mainly dominated by a dark energy component with negative pressure, driving the accelerated expansion of the universe. One of the most attractive options is the cosmological constant Λ, but it has the well - known fine - tuning and coincidence problems. Therefore, many dynamic scalar - field dark - energy models (such as the "quintessence" model) have been proposed, but these models also require fine - tuning.
At the same time, in the standard model, a non - baryonic, clustering dark - matter component is also required to make the large - scale structure predictions consistent with the observations. Recently, a new matter candidate - the generalized Chaplygin gas (GCG) - has been proposed, which may be a "hybrid" solution to the dark - energy and dark - matter problems.
### Paper Objectives
The main objective of this paper is to evaluate the strength of the generalized Chaplygin gas as a dark - energy candidate. Although there have been many studies on the behavior of GCG, a comprehensive analysis of the various complementary data sets currently available has not yet been carried out to determine whether these exotic matter types can be regarded as a serious alternative to the Λ - CDM scenario.
### Main Contents
1. **Background Evolution**: Study the background evolution of GCG under different parameters and discuss its impact on supernova observations.
2. **Perturbation Evolution**: Extend the discussion to perturbations in Chaplygin gas and study their impact on structure formation.
3. **Radiation Perturbations and CMB Spectrum**: Consider the impact of GCG on radiation perturbations and the CMB spectrum.
4. **Likelihood Analysis**: Use supernova, CMB, and large - scale structure data for likelihood analysis and compare the GCG + CDM + baryon universe with the pure Λ - CDM model.
### Conclusions
Through the above analysis, the author finds that the current data tend to support behavior similar to the cosmological constant, especially when considering perturbation evolution. Although GCG shows a certain degeneracy with Λ in background evolution, at the perturbation level, the data tend to support the ordinary Λ theory more. For the unified dark - matter model (i.e., the case without cold dark matter), the data strongly oppose this model. Therefore, based on current observations, Chaplygin gas, at least in its adiabatic perturbation form, does not provide an alternative superior to the scenario that includes cold dark matter and the cosmological constant.
### Formula Summary
1. **Equation of State**:
\[
p=-|w_{0}|\Omega_{ch}\rho_{0}\left(\frac{\rho}{\rho_{0}}\right)^{-\alpha}
\]
\[
w(a)=-|w_{0}|\left[|w_{0}|+(1 - |w_{0}|)a^{-3(1+\alpha)}\right]
\]
2. **Density Evolution**:
\[
\rho(a)=\Omega_{ch}\rho_{0}\left[|w_{0}|+(1 - |w_{0}|)a^{-3(1+\alpha)}\right]^{\frac{1}{1+\alpha}}
\]
3. **Effective Matter Density**:
\[
\Omega_{m,eff}=\Omega_{m}+\Omega_{ch}(1 - |w_{0}|)^{\frac{1}{1+\alpha}}
\]
4. **Sound Speed**:
\[
c_{s}^{2}=\frac{\delta p}{\delta\rho}=\frac{\dot{p}}{\dot{\rho}}=-w\alpha
\]
5. **ISW Effect**:
\[
S