Abstract:Objective: To determine the effectiveness of students' rating as a teacher evaluation tool. Study design: Concurrent mixed method. Place and duration of study: King Edward Medical University, Lahore, from January to June 2010. Methodology: Anonymous 5-point Likert scale survey questionnaire was conducted involving a single class consisting of 310 students and 12 students were selected for structured interview based on non-probability purposive sampling. Informed consent was procured. They were required to rate 6 teachers and were supposed to discuss teachers' performance in detail. Quantitative data collected through survey was analyzed using SPSS 15 and qualitative data was analyzed with the help of content analysis by identifying themes and patterns from thick descriptions. This student feedback would show the effectiveness in terms of its feasibility and as an indicator of teaching attributes. Results: Descriptive statistics of quantitative data obtained from survey was used to calculate mean and standard deviation for all teachers' individually. This showed the average direction of the student ratings. Percentages of the responses calculated of teacher A were 85.96%, teacher B 65.53, teacher C 65.20%, teacher D 69.62%, teacher E 65.32% and teacher F 64.24% in terms of overall effectiveness of their teaching. Structured interviews generated qualitative data which validated the students' views about strengths and weaknesses of teachers, and helped to determine the effectiveness of their rating and feedback. Conclusion: This simple rating system clearly showed its importance and hence can be used in institutions as a regular evaluating method of teaching faculty.

Validity of student evaluations of instructional effectiveness: A comparison of faculty self-evaluations and evaluations by their students.

Comparison of online and classroom-based student evaluations of instruction

Student Ratings of College Teaching: Reliability, Validity, and Usefulness

Are Student Evaluations of Teaching Effectiveness Valid for Measuring Student Learning Outcomes in Business Related Classes? A Neural Network and Bayesian Analyses

Course evaluation scores: valid measures for teaching effectiveness or rewards for lenient grading?

The relative importance of teaching evaluation criteria from the points of view of students and faculty

The student evaluation of teaching and likability: what the evaluations actually measure

Meta-analysis of faculty's teaching effectiveness: Student evaluation of teaching ratings and student learning are not related

Are they the same? Comparing the instructional quality of online and face‐to‐face graduate education courses

A Comparison of Student Achievement and Satisfaction in an Online Versus a Traditional Face-to-Face Statistics Class

Information literacy self-efficacy versus performance: Secondary students

The student evaluation of teaching and the competence of students as evaluators

Identifying factors underlying the quality of online teaching effectiveness: An exploratory study

Peer assessment, self-assessment, and resultant feedback: an examination of feasibility and reliability

Sexism, racism, prejudice, and bias: a literature review and synthesis of research surrounding student evaluations of courses and teaching

Student and teaching characteristics related to ratings of instruction in medical sciences graduate programs

Don’t blame the teacher? The need to account for classroom characteristics in evaluations of teaching quality.

Differential Relationships of Student, Instructor, and Course Characteristics to General and Specific Items on a Course Evaluation Questionnaire

Student rating as an effective tool for teacher evaluation

A comparison of the validity of two instruments assessing health professional student perceptions of interprofessional education and practice

Student evaluation of teaching quality in higher education: development of an instrument based on 10 Likert‐scales