Abstract:This paper empirically examines the relationship between services trade liberalization and economic growth. Services trade currently comprises approximately 20 percent of total world trade, with more than half of the world’s labor force employed in service sectors. The possibility that reducing barriers can enhance global production is increasingly receiving attention. The impact of liberalization on growth is empirically assessed by including services trade restrictiveness as the key variable of interest in cross-sectional estimations of a global production function. Income dummies were interacted with levels of services trade restrictiveness to discern variations of influence across countries at different income levels. Services trade restrictiveness is captured using a World Bank index for a pooled cross-section of countries. Robustness of results are evaluated using a similar services trade restrictiveness index recently constructed by the OECD for member countries. The results suggest that services trade liberalization has a positive impact on a country’s per capita GDP. This benefit of service liberalization is larger in countries with greater services export values. In addition, service liberalization in low income countries has a greater impact on per capita income levels than does service liberalization in high income countries. While positive and statistically significant, the scale of the effect appears small. The robustness of the results were tested using an alternate measure of services trade restrictiveness for OECD countries. These robustness results validated the benchmark results and also suggested, for high income countries, the liberalization of services trade may have a non-linear influence on per capita income growth. These findings underscore the importance of including service trade liberalization as a part of trade policy discussions and development agendas, as liberalization of services restrictions may stimulate growth in per capita income and highlights that removing the barriers to services trade can positively impact income levels, especially in low-income countries. Currently, policies surrounding services trade liberalization largely occur at the bilateral agreement level. However, as knowledge grows about the possible benefits of services trade liberalization, movement towards multilateral recommendations may be optimal.

Does Financial Liberalization Spur Growth?

Financial Openness and Productivity

Financial Liberalization and Innovation

FINANCIAL LIBERALIZATION AND STOCK MARKET EFFICIENCY: MEASURING THE THRESHOLD EFFECTS OF GOVERNANCE

Analysis of the Effects of Financial Liberalization on the Economy

Do Financial Liberalization and Gender Inequality Moderate Trade Liberalization's Impact on Growth in European Transition Economies?

How Will Financial Liberalization Change the Chinese Economy? Lessons from Middle-Income Countries

Does Financial Repression Inhibit or Facilitate Economic Growth? A Case Study of Chinese Reform Experience*

Financial Liberalization, Credit Market Dynamism, and Allocative Efficiency

Influence of Conditional Factors on the Financial Liberalization and Economic Growth Nexus in Tanzania

Interest rate liberalization and economic growth nexus: does corruption matter?

Stock market liberalization and innovation

Does openness to international financial flows raise productivity growth?

Impact of Financial Development, Financial Liberalization and Economic Growth on Financial Instability: Evidence from Panel Data

Capital inflow liberalization and bank credit risk

Financial Liberalization and the Middle-Income Trap

Does Financial Repression Inhibit Economic Growth ? Empirical Examination of China ’ s Reform Experience

Service Trade Liberalization And Economic Growth

THEORETICAL AND METHODOLOGICAL ASPECTS OF FINANCIAL PROVISION OF ECONOMIC GROWTH

Impact of financial inclusion on economic growth, financial development, financial efficiency, financial stability, and profitability: an international evidence

Financial Development, Interest Rate Liberalization, and Macroeconomic Volatility