Coronary microvascular dysfunction assessment: A comparative analysis of procedural aspects

Ilan Merdler,Ryan Wallace,Avantika Banerjee,Giorgio A. Medranda,Pavan Reddy,Matteo Cellamare,Cheng Zhang,Sevket Tolga Ozturk,Vaishnavi Sawant,Kassandra Lopez,Itsik Ben‐Dor,Ron Waksman,Brian C. Case,Hayder D. Hashim
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.30990
IF: 2.3
2024-03-25
Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions
Abstract:Background Full adoption of coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) assessment faces challenges due to its invasive nature and concerns about prolonged procedure time and increased contrast and/or radiation exposure. We compared procedural aspects of CMD invasive assessment to diagnostic left heart catheterization (DLHC) in patients with chest pain who were not found to have obstructive coronary artery disease. Methods A total of 227 patients in the Coronary Microvascular Disease Registry were compared to 1592 patients who underwent DLHC from August 2021 to November 2023. The two cohorts were compared using propensity‐score matching; primary outcomes were fluoroscopy time and total contrast use. Results The participants' mean age was 64.1 ± 12.6 years. CMD‐assessed patients were more likely to be female (66.5% vs. 45.2%, p
cardiac & cardiovascular systems
What problem does this paper attempt to address?