Are novel or locally adapted pathogens more devastating and why? Resolving opposing hypotheses
Erin L. Sauer,Matthew D. Venesky,Taegan A. McMahon,Jeremy M. Cohen,Scott Bessler,Laura A. Brannelly,Forrest Brem,Allison Q. Byrne,Neal Halstead,Oliver Hyman,Pieter T. J. Johnson,Corinne L. Richards‐Zawacki,Samantha L. Rumschlag,Brittany Sears,Jason R. Rohr
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.14431
IF: 11.274
2024-05-09
Ecology Letters
Abstract:The naïve host syndrome hypothesis suggests that pathogens are able to easily invade and become deadly to novel hosts because of a lack of co‐evolutionary history, whereas the local adaptation hypothesis suggests that pathogens are better able to invade local hosts because of their co‐evolutionary history, but rarely do studies on these two hypotheses cite one another or acknowledge their ostensibly mixed messages. By combining a continental‐scale, factorial, common garden experiment with a global‐scale meta‐analysis, each on the amphibian‐chytrid fungus host‐pathogen system, we show that local host‐pathogen interactions typically resulted in higher host mortality, greater infection success, and higher pathogen loads, but that there was substantial variation in novel host‐pathogen outcomes and thus moving pathogens around the planet increases the likelihood of exposure to particularly virulent pathogen strains and particularly deadly host‐pathogen combination. Therefore, we provide support for both the local adaptation and naïve host syndrome hypotheses, highlight how the two hypotheses are complementary rather than conflicting, and emphasize the need for greater integration of these hypotheses and their associated semi‐disparate literature. There is a rich literature highlighting that pathogens are generally better adapted to infect local than novel hosts, and a separate seemingly contradictory literature indicating that novel pathogens pose the greatest threat to biodiversity and public health. Here, using Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis, the fungus associated with worldwide amphibian declines, we test the hypothesis that there is enough variance in "novel" (quantified by geographic and phylogenetic distance) host‐pathogen outcomes to pose substantial risk of pathogen introductions despite local adaptation being common. Our continental‐scale common garden experiment and global‐scale meta‐analysis demonstrate that local amphibian‐fungal interactions result in higher pathogen prevalence, pathogen growth, and host mortality, but novel interactions led to variable consequences with especially virulent host‐pathogen combinations still occurring. Thus, while most pathogen introductions are benign, enough variance exists in novel host‐pathogen outcomes that moving organisms around the planet greatly increases the chance of pathogen introductions causing profound harm.
ecology