Air tab location effect on supersonic jet mixing

Mahendra Perumal Govindan,Aravindh Kumar Suseela Moorthi,Srinivasan Elangovan,Munisamy Sundararaj,Ethirajan Rathakrishnan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/tjj-2024-0017
IF: 1.923
2024-04-04
International Journal of Turbo and Jet Engines
Abstract:Mixing of Mach 2.1 circular, jet issuing from a straight convergent-divergent circular nozzle, in the presence of sonic air tabs at exit and shifted locations along the jet axis was investigated experimentally at nozzle pressure ratios (NPR) 3–6, insteps of 1. Two constant area tubes of 1 mm diameter positioned diametrically opposite, at 0 D, 0.25 D, 0.5 D and 0.75 D (where D is the nozzle exit diameter), were used for fluidic injection. The injection pressure ratio (IPR) of air tabs was maintained at 6. The Mach 2.1 jet operated at nozzle pressure ratio (NPR) in the range of overexpanded states corresponding to NPR 3–6 was controlled with the sonic air tabs operating at the underexpanded state corresponding to IPR 6. The impact of air tabs on jet mixing was studied from the measured Pitot pressure along the jet centerline. The centerline pressure decay of the jet confirms that the air tab promotes jet mixing with the entrained air mass, and the mixing promotion caused by the air tab is dependent on tab location as well as the NPR. In the presence of air tabs, the jet possesses shorter core and experiences faster decay than the uncontrolled jet. Also, the air tabs were effective in reducing the number of shock cells and rendering the waves weaker in the jet core. Among the tab locations, the mixing promoting effectiveness of air tabs at 0 D is better than the tabs at shifted locations. The jet core length reduction caused by the air tab at 0 D increases from 25.4 % to 77.2 %, with increasing NPR from 3 to 6. The same trend was noticed for tab location 0.75 D, but not for 0.25 D and 0.5 D locations. The core length reduction for 0.75 D tab location is about 61.4 %, at NPR 6, and 62.1 % and 55.8 %, for NPR 5 and 4 for tab locations 0.25 D and 0.5 D, respectively. Shadowgraph images of the waves present in the jet core confirms the findings of centerline pressure decay results.
engineering, aerospace
What problem does this paper attempt to address?