Abstract:Background: The evidence-based Collaborative Chronic Care Model (CCM), developed to help structure care for chronic health conditions, comprises six elements: work role redesign, patient self-management support, provider decision support, clinical information systems, linkages to community resources, and organizational/leadership support. As the CCM is increasingly implemented in real-world settings, there is heightened interest in understanding specific influences upon implementation. Therefore, guided by the Integrated Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services (i-PARIHS) framework, we (i) identified innovation-, recipient-, context-, and facilitation-related influences on CCM implementation and (ii) assessed the influences' relationship to each CCM element's implementation. Methods: Using semi-structured interviews, we examined interdisciplinary behavioral health providers' experiences at nine VA medical centers that implemented the CCM. We used i-PARIHS constructs as a priori codes for directed content analysis, then analyzed the data for cross-coding by CCM element and i-PARIHS construct. Results: Participants (31 providers) perceived the CCM innovation as enabling comprehensive care but challenging to coordinate with existing structures/procedures. As recipients, participants recounted not always having the authority to design CCM-consistent care processes. They perceived local leadership support to be indispensable to implementation success and difficult to garner when CCM implementation distracted from other organizational priorities. They found implementation facilitation helpful for keeping implementation on track. We identified key themes at the intersection of i-PARIHS constructs and core CCM elements, including (i) the CCM being an innovation that offers a formal structure to stepping down care intensity for patients to encourage their self-management, (ii) recipients accessing their multidisciplinary colleagues' expertise for provider decision support, (iii) relationships with external services in the community (e.g., homelessness programs) being a helpful context for providing comprehensive care, and (iv) facilitators helping to redesign specific interdisciplinary team member roles. Conclusions: Future CCM implementation would benefit from (i) facilitating strategic development of supportive maintenance plans for patients' self-management, (ii) collocating multidisciplinary staff (on-site or virtually) to enhance provider decision support, (iii) keeping information on available community resources up to date, and (iv) making clearer the explicit CCM-consistent care processes that work roles can be designed around. This work can inform concrete tailoring of implementation efforts to focus on the more challenging CCM elements, which is crucial to better account for multiple influences that vary across diverse care settings in which the CCM is being implemented.

Sustaining the collaborative chronic care model in outpatient mental health: a matrixed multiple case study

Interdisciplinary behavioral health provider perceptions of implementing the Collaborative Chronic Care Model: an i-PARIHS-guided qualitative study

A mixed-methods study of system-level sustainability of evidence-based practices in 12 large-scale implementation initiatives

Mixed-method study of a conceptual model of evidence-based intervention sustainment across multiple public-sector service settings

Multilevel perspectives on the implementation of the collaborative care model for depression and anxiety in primary care

A structured approach to modifying an implementation package while scaling up a complex evidence‐based practice

Outer-context determinants in the sustainment phase of a reimbursement-driven implementation of evidence-based practices in children’s mental health services

Multi-level alignment processes in the sustainment of a youth substance use treatment model following a federal implementation initiative: A mixed method study

Determinants of inter-organizational implementation success: A mixed-methods evaluation of Veteran Directed Care

Sustainability of an Interprofessional Collaborative Practice Model for Population Health

Implementation support for the data-driven components of care in a multisite network of coordinated specialty care programs

Continuous Care Provided Through Comprehensive Medication Management in an Acute Care Practice Model

Different factors identified by stakeholder group for barriers and facilitators to measurement‐based care implementation in behavioral health clinics

The Challenge of Integrated Care for Mental Health: Leaving the 50 minute hour and Other Sacred Things

Implementation of an integrated pharmacist collaborative care model in specialty disease state clinics

Evaluation of a Telehealth-Based Pharmacist Led Chronic Care Management Program

Observations from the national implementation of Measurement Based Care in Mental Health in the Department of Veterans Affairs.

Healing the Whole: An International Review of the Collaborative Care Model between Primary Care and Psychiatry

Sustainability of an outcome measure in outpatient stroke rehabilitation: A realist evaluation

Do Collaborative Care Managers and Technology Enhance Primary Care Satisfaction with Care from Embedded Mental Health Providers?

Provider Use of, Attitudes Towards, and Self-efficacy with Key Measurement-based Care Practices in Youth Mental Health Treatment: A Multi-site Examination