Weaning from Kidney Replacement Therapy in the Critically Ill Patient with Acute Kidney Injury

Kada Klouche,Vincent Brunot,Romaric Larcher,Alexandre Lautrette
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13020579
IF: 3.9
2024-01-20
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Abstract:Around 10% of critically ill patients suffer acute kidney injury (AKI) requiring kidney replacement therapy (KRT), with a mortality rate approaching 50%. Although most survivors achieve sufficient renal recovery to be weaned from KRT, there are no recognized guidelines on the optimal period for weaning from KRT. A systematic review was conducted using a peer-reviewed strategy, combining themes of KRT (intermittent hemodialysis, CKRT: continuous veno-venous hemo/dialysis/filtration/diafiltration, sustained low-efficiency dialysis/filtration), factors predictive of successful weaning (defined as a prolonged period without new KRT) and patient outcomes. Our research resulted in studies, all observational, describing clinical and biological parameters predictive of successful weaning from KRT. Urine output prior to KRT cessation is the most studied variable and the most widely used in practice. Other predictive factors, such as urinary urea and creatinine and new urinary and serum renal biomarkers, including cystatin C and neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL), were also analyzed in the light of recent studies. This review presents the rationale for early weaning from KRT, the parameters that can guide it, and its practical modalities. Once the patient's clinical condition has stabilized and volume status optimized, a diuresis greater than 500 mL/day should prompt the intensivist to consider weaning. Urinary parameters could be useful in predicting weaning success but have yet to be validated.
medicine, general & internal
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is about how patients with acute kidney injury (AKI) can be safely and effectively withdrawn from kidney replacement therapy (KRT) during intensive care. Although most surviving patients can recover sufficient renal function to stop KRT, there are currently no clear guidelines for the optimal time to withdraw KRT. Through a systematic review, the paper combines different modes of KRT (intermittent hemodialysis, continuous veno - venous hemofiltration/dialysis/filtration/diafiltration, sustained low - efficiency dialysis/filtration), predictors of successful KRT withdrawal (defined as no longer requiring new KRT for a long time), and the prognosis of patients, aiming to provide evidence regarding the rationality of early KRT withdrawal, guiding parameters, and practical operation methods. Specifically, the paper explores the effectiveness of urine output, urea and creatinine levels, new urinary and serum renal biomarkers such as cystatin C and neutrophil gelatinase - associated lipocalin (NGAL) as predictors of successful KRT withdrawal.