Abstract:Virtual reality (VR) applications are developing rapidly, becoming more and more affordable, and offer various advantages for learning contexts. Dynamic visualizations are generally suitable for depicting continuous processes (e.g., different movement patterns), and particularly dynamic virtual 3D-objects can provide different perspectives on the movements. The present study investigated through a low immersive (desktop "VR", Study 1) and a high immersive virtual environment (immersive VR; Study 2) the effectiveness of different interaction formats to view 3D-objects from different perspectives. Participants controlled either the orientation of the 3D-objects (Study 1, mouse interaction; Study 2, hand interaction via VR controllers) or their viewpoint in relation to the 3D-objects (Study 1, camera position; Study 2, position of participants' own body). Additionally, the moderating influence of learners' visuospatial ability was addressed. Dependent variables were pictorial recognition (easy, medium, difficult), factual knowledge, presence, and motion sickness. Results showed that higher-visuospatial-ability learners outperformed lower-visuospatial-ability learners. In Study 1, higher-visuospatial-ability learners showed higher recognition performance (difficult items) by controlling the camera position, whereas lower-visuospatial-ability learners suffered from this interaction format. In Study 2, higher-visuospatial-ability learners achieved better recognition performance (easy items) by controlling the 3D-models, whereas lower-visuospatial-ability learners tended to profit from moving around the 3D-objects (medium items). The immersive VR yielded more presence and higher motion sickness. This study clearly shows that different interaction formats to view 3D-objects from multiple perspectives in Desktop-VR are not transferable on a one-to-one basis into immersive VR. The results and implications for the design of virtual learning environments are discussed.

View dependence in scene recognition after active learning

Effect of Interaction Characteristics of Virtual Environments on Spatial Representation

A scene with an invisible wall - navigational experience shapes visual scene representation

Active and passive scene recognition across views

Viewpoint dependence and scene context effects generalize to depth rotated three-dimensional objects

Reference frames in virtual spatial navigation are viewpoint dependent

How Learners' Visuospatial Ability and Different Ways of Changing the Perspective Influence Learning About Movements in Desktop and Immersive Virtual Reality Environments

Variable-Viewpoint Representations for 3D Object Recognition

Spatial vs temporal continuity in view invariant visual object recognition learning.

Spatial updating of map-acquired representation

The importance of multisensory-motor learning on subsequent visual recognition

Perspective switch and spatial knowledge acquisition: effects of age, mental rotation ability and visuospatial memory capacity on route learning in virtual environments with different levels of realism

Invariant Object Recognition in the Visual System with Novel Views of 3D Objects

Neural mechanisms of recognizing scene configurations from multiple viewpoints.

Knowing where to go: Spatial memory guides eye and body movements in a naturalistic visual search task

Interaction of orientation cues within a nested virtual environment

Embodied Question Answering in Photorealistic Environments With Point Cloud Perception

Learning Virtual View Selection for 3D Scene Semantic Segmentation

Roles of egocentric and allocentric spatial representations in locomotion and reorientation.

Learning to Look Around: Intelligently Exploring Unseen Environments for Unknown Tasks

Viewpoint adaptation revealed potential representational differences between 2D images and 3D objects