Anatomic and physiologic diagnostic discrepancies in fetuses with single ventricle congenital heart disease in a contemporary cohort

T. Patel,J. Kreeger,R. Sachdeva,W. Border,E. Michelfelder

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.27575

2024-01-12

Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology

Abstract:Objective Image quality of fetal echocardiography (FE) has improved in the recent era, but few recent studies have reported the accuracy of FE specifically in single ventricle congenital heart disease (SV). Our study aims to assess the ability of FE to correctly predict postnatal anatomy and physiology in SV in a contemporary cohort. Methods The contemporary, clinical reports of FE with SV performed from 7/2017 to 7/2021 were compared with postnatal echocardiograms in a formal quality assurance program. SV were grouped by anatomic subtype. Diagnostic errors were designated as major if the error would have resulted in significant alteration in fetal counseling or postnatal management. Remaining errors were classified as minor. Physiologic discrepancies, including prostaglandin dependency (PGE‐D), atrioventricular valve regurgitation (AVVR), pulmonary venous obstruction, and atrial septal restriction were assessed by review of postnatal course. Results A total of 119 subjects were analyzed. SV subtypes in the cohort included hypoplastic left heart syndrome (HLHS) (n=68), tricuspid atresia (n=16), double inlet left ventricle (n=12), unbalanced atrioventricular canal (UAVC) (n=11), heterotaxy (n=9), and other (n=3). The rate of major anatomic and physiologic errors was low (n=6, 5.0%). A higher proportion of minor errors were noted in HLHS and tricuspid atresia but the differences were not statistically significant. Physiologic discrepancies were uncommon, with three major discrepancies including underestimation of degree of venous obstruction in one non‐HLHS fetus with total anomalous pulmonary venous return, overestimation of atrial septal restriction in one HLHS fetus, and incorrect prediction of PGE‐D with 1 false‐negative for pulmonary blood flow. No discrepancy in degree of AVVR or atrial septal restriction affected postnatal care. Minor physiologic discrepancies included two false‐positive predictions of PGE‐D with 1 false‐positive for ductal‐dependent systemic flow, and 1 false‐positive for pulmonary blood flow. Conclusions In this contemporary review of FE in SV at our center, there was high accuracy in describing anatomic and physiologic findings in fetuses with SV. Major physiologic discrepancies were uncommon but included important cases of false‐negative prediction of PGE‐dependence and underestimation of obstruction of total anomalous pulmonary venous return. These data can both inform more accurate counseling of families with SV fetuses and guide diagnostic improvement efforts. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging,obstetrics & gynecology,acoustics