Identification of biomarkers predictive of metastasis development in early-stage colorectal cancer using network-based regularization
Carolina Peixoto,Marta B. Lopes,Marta Martins,Sandra Casimiro,Daniel Sobral,Ana Rita Grosso,Catarina Abreu,Daniela Macedo,Ana Lúcia Costa,Helena Pais,Cecília Alvim,André Mansinho,Pedro Filipe,Pedro Marques da Costa,Afonso Fernandes,Paula Borralho,Cristina Ferreira,João Malaquias,António Quintela,Shannon Kaplan,Mahdi Golkaram,Michael Salmans,Nafeesa Khan,Raakhee Vijayaraghavan,Shile Zhang,Traci Pawlowski,Jim Godsey,Alex So,Li Liu,Luís Costa,Susana Vinga
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12859-022-05104-z
IF: 3.307
2023-01-18
BMC Bioinformatics
Abstract:Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer and the second most deathly worldwide. It is a very heterogeneous disease that can develop via distinct pathways where metastasis is the primary cause of death. Therefore, it is crucial to understand the molecular mechanisms underlying metastasis. RNA-sequencing is an essential tool used for studying the transcriptional landscape. However, the high-dimensionality of gene expression data makes selecting novel metastatic biomarkers problematic. To distinguish early-stage CRC patients at risk of developing metastasis from those that are not, three types of binary classification approaches were used: (1) classification methods (decision trees, linear and radial kernel support vector machines, logistic regression, and random forest) using differentially expressed genes (DEGs) as input features; (2) regularized logistic regression based on the Elastic Net penalty and the proposed iTwiner—a network-based regularizer accounting for gene correlation information; and (3) classification methods based on the genes pre-selected using regularized logistic regression. Classifiers using the DEGs as features showed similar results, with random forest showing the highest accuracy. Using regularized logistic regression on the full dataset yielded no improvement in the methods' accuracy. Further classification using the pre-selected genes found by different penalty factors, instead of the DEGs, significantly improved the accuracy of the binary classifiers. Moreover, the use of network-based correlation information (iTwiner) for gene selection produced the best classification results and the identification of more stable and robust gene sets. Some are known to be tumor suppressor genes ( OPCML-IT2 ), to be related to resistance to cancer therapies ( RAC1P3 ), or to be involved in several cancer processes such as genome stability ( XRCC6P2 ), tumor growth and metastasis ( MIR602 ) and regulation of gene transcription ( NME2P2 ). We show that the classification of CRC patients based on pre-selected features by regularized logistic regression is a valuable alternative to using DEGs, significantly increasing the models' predictive performance. Moreover, the use of correlation-based penalization for biomarker selection stands as a promising strategy for predicting patients' groups based on RNA-seq data.
biochemical research methods,biotechnology & applied microbiology,mathematical & computational biology