Clinical Pilot of a Deep Learning Elastic Registration Algorithm to Improve Misregistration Artifact and Image Quality on Routine Oncologic PET/CT

Jordan H. Chamberlin,Joshua Schaefferkoetter,James Hamill,Ismail M. Kabakus,Kevin P. Horn,Jim O’Doherty,Saeed Elojeimy
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2024.09.044
IF: 5.482
2024-10-30
Academic Radiology
Abstract:Rationale and Objectives Misregistration artifacts between the PET and attenuation correction CT (CTAC) exams can degrade image quality and cause diagnostic errors. Deep learning (DL)-warped elastic registration methods have been proposed to improve misregistration errors. Materials and Methods 30 patients undergoing routine oncologic examination (20 18 F-FDG PET/CT and 10 64 Cu-DOTATATE PET/CT) were retrospectively identified and compared using unmodified CTAC, and a DL-augmented spatial transformation CT attenuation map. Primary endpoints included differences in subjective image quality and standardized uptake values (SUV). Exams were randomized to reduce reader bias, and three radiologists rated image quality across six anatomic sites using a modified Likert scale. Measures of local bias and lesion SUV were also quantitatively evaluated. Results The DL attenuation correction methods were associated with higher image quality and reduced misregistration artifacts (Mean 18 F-FDG quality rating = 3.5–3.8 for DL vs 3.2–3.5 for standard reconstruction (STD); Mean 64 Cu-DOTATATE quality rating = 3.2–3.4 for DL vs 2.1–3.3; P < 0.05 for STD, for all except 64 Cu-DOTATATE inferior spleen). Percent change in superior liver SUV mean for 18 F-FDG and 64 Cu-DOTATATE were 5.3 ± 4.9 and 8.2 ± 4.1%, respectively. Measures of signal-to-noise ratio were significantly improved for the DL over STD (Hepatopulmonary index (HPI) [ 18 F-FDG] = 4.5 ± 1.2 vs 4.0 ± 1.1, P < 0.001; HPI [ 64 Cu-DOTATATE] = 16.4 ± 16.9 vs 12.5 ± 5.5, P = 0.039). Conclusion Deep learning elastic registration for CT attenuation correction maps on routine oncology PET/CT decreases misregistration artifacts, with a greater impact on PET scans with longer acquisition times.
radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging
What problem does this paper attempt to address?