N. Kauer
Abstract:Hadron collider cross sections for tt~ production and di-lepton, single-lepton and all-jet decays with up to 2 additional jets are calculated using complete LO matrix elements with 6-, 7- and 8-particle final states. The fixed-width, complex-mass and overall-factor schemes (FWS, CMS & OFS) are employed and the quality of narrow-width and double-pole approximations (NWA & DPA) is investigated for inclusive production and suppressed backgrounds to new particle searches. NWA and DPA cross sections differ by 1% or less. The inclusion of sub- and non-resonant amplitudes effects a cross section increase of 5-8% at pp supercolliders, but only minor changes at the Tevatron. On-shell tt~/Wtb backgrounds for the H --> WW decay in weak boson fusion, the hadronic \tau decay of a heavy H^\pm and the \phi --> hh --> \tau\tau bb~ radion decay at the LHC are updated, with corrections ranging from 3% to 30%. FWS and CMS cross sections are uniformly consistent, but OFS cross sections are up to 6% smaller for some backgrounds.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problems that this paper attempts to solve are: in high - energy physics, in the calculation of the production cross - section of top quark pairs, whether the traditional narrow - width approximation (NWA) and double - pole approximation (DPA) are accurate enough. Specifically, the author focuses on how these approximation methods perform when including sub - resonant and non - resonant amplitude contributions, especially at different collider energies (such as Tevatron, LHC and VLHC). In addition, the paper also explores the consistency of different finite - width schemes (FWS, CMS and OFS) in dealing with the propagators of unstable particles and evaluates their impact on the background cross - section of new - particle searches.
### Main problems:
1. **Accuracy of traditional approximation methods**: Are the applications of NWA and DPA in top - quark - pair production accurate enough, especially when considering sub - resonant and non - resonant contributions?
2. **Consistency of different finite - width schemes**: Are the performances of FWS, CMS and OFS consistent in dealing with the propagators of unstable particles, and what are their impacts on the calculation results?
3. **Impact on new - particle - search background**: What are the impacts of sub - resonant and non - resonant contributions on the background cross - section of new - particle searches, especially for processes such as Higgs - boson decay to WW, heavy charged Higgs decay?
### Solutions:
- Use the complete tree - level matrix elements (including final states of 6, 7 and 8 particles) to calculate the cross - section of top - quark - pair production, rather than being limited to the resonant phase - space region.
- Compare the results of NWA, DPA and the complete LO matrix elements including all sub - resonant and non - resonant contributions.
- Implement and compare three different finite - width schemes (FWS, CMS and OFS) to evaluate their performances at different collider energies.
- Apply optimized selection cuts (such as central - jet veto) to study the changes in the background cross - section of new - particle searches.
Through these methods, the author aims to provide more accurate theoretical predictions to meet the challenges of top - quark - pair production in future collider experiments and provide reliable background estimates for new - particle searches.