The Partition Ensemble Fallacy Fallacy

Kae Nemoto,Samuel L. Braunstein

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.quant-ph/0207135

2002-07-23

Abstract:The Partition Ensemble Fallacy was recently applied to claim no quantum coherence exists in coherent states produced by lasers. We show that this claim relies on an untestable belief of a particular prior distribution of absolute phase. One's choice for the prior distribution for an unobservable quantity is a matter of `religion'. We call this principle the Partition Ensemble Fallacy Fallacy. Further, we show an alternative approach to construct a relative-quantity Hilbert subspace where unobservability of certain quantities is guaranteed by global conservation laws. This approach is applied to coherent states and constructs an approximate relative-phase Hilbert subspace.

Quantum Physics

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problems that this paper attempts to solve are related to the observation and characteristic analysis of six type - I X - ray burst sources (SAXJ1324.5 −6313, SAXJ1818.7+1424, SAXJ1828.5 −1037, SAXJ2224.9+5421, 2S1711 −339 and 2S0918 −549). Specifically, the research aims to:

1. **Discover new X - ray burst sources**: Three definite new X - ray burst sources (SAXJ1324.5 −6313, 2S1711 −339 and SAXJ1828.5 −1037) and two possible new X - ray burst sources (SAXJ1818.7+1424 and SAXJ2224.9+5421) were discovered through the BeppoSAX wide - field camera. In addition, the second outburst from the sixth source (2S0918 −549) was also observed.

2. **Study X - ray burst sources at low persistent flux levels**: Four newly discovered X - ray burst sources (excluding 2S1711−339 and 2S0918 −549) exhibit very low persistent flux levels, and only a single outburst was observed without persistent radiation. These sources are classified into the recently proposed category of X - ray burst sources with significantly low persistent flux levels.

3. **Verify theoretical predictions**: According to the theory, outbursts emitted from extremely low flux levels should last for more than 100 seconds. The research verified this theoretical prediction and found that the outbursts of some sources (such as SAXJ1828.5 −1037 and 2S0918 −549) do indeed conform to this characteristic, while the outbursts of other sources (such as SAXJ1324.5 −6313, SAXJ1818.7+1424 and SAXJ2224.9+5421) do not.

4. **Estimate distances and other physical parameters**: By analyzing the peak fluxes of the outbursts, the researchers estimated the distances of some sources. For example, the distance of 2S0918 −549 was inferred to be 4.2 kiloparsecs (kpc) from its radius - expansion outburst, and upper - limit distances for other sources were provided.

### Formula summary

- **Eddington limit**: \[ L_{\text{Edd}}=\frac{4\pi c G M}{\sigma_T} \]
- \( L_{\text{Edd}} \) is the Eddington - limit luminosity
- \( c \) is the speed of light
- \( G \) is the gravitational constant
- \( M \) is the mass of the neutron star
- \( \sigma_T \) is the Thomson scattering cross - section

- **Black - body temperature and radius**: \[ F_{\text{bol}}=\sigma_B T^4\left(\frac{R}{d}\right)^2 \]
- \( F_{\text{bol}} \) is the bolometric flux
- \( \sigma_B \) is the Stefan - Boltzmann constant
- \( T \) is the black - body temperature
- \( R \) is the radius
- \( d \) is the distance

Through these observations and analyses, the researchers hope to better understand the physical mechanisms of X - ray bursts and their distribution in the Milky Way.