Abstract:Quantum annealing (QA) is a method for solving combinatorial optimization problems. We can estimate the computational time for QA using the adiabatic condition. The adiabatic condition consists of two parts: an energy gap and a transition matrix. Most past studies have focused on the relationship between the energy gap and computational time. The success probability of QA is considered to decrease exponentially owing to the exponentially decreasing energy gap at the first-order phase-transition point. In this study, through a detailed analysis of the relationship between the energy gap, transition matrix, and computational cost during QA, we propose a general method for constructing counterintuitive models wherein QA with a constant annealing time fails despite a constant energy gap, based on polynomial energy. We assume that the energy of the total Hamiltonian is at most $\Theta(L)$, where $L$ is the number of qubits. In our formalism, we choose a known model that exhibits an exponentially small energy gap during QA, and modify the model by adding a specific penalty term to the Hamiltonian. In the modified model, the transition matrix in the adiabatic condition becomes exponentially large as the number of qubits increases, while the energy gap remains constant. Moreover, we achieve a quadratic speedup, for which the upper bound for improvement in the adiabatic condition is determined by the polynomial energy. As examples, we consider the adiabatic Grover search and the $p$-spin model. In these cases, with the addition of the penalty term, although the success probability of QA on the modified models becomes exponentially small despite a constant energy gap; we can achieve a success probability considerably higher than that of conventional QA. Moreover, we numerically show the scaling of the computational cost is quadratically improved compared to the conventional QA.

Speedup in Quantum Adiabatic Evolution Algorithm

Quantum Adiabatic Evolutions That Can't Be Used to Design Efficient Algorithms

Circumventing superexponential runtimes for hard instances of quantum adiabatic optimization

A Modified Quantum Adiabatic Evolution for the Deutsch–Jozsa Problem

Measurements of sin2Beta at BABAR with charmonium and penguin decays

Staying adiabatic with unknown energy gap

Quantum search by partial adiabatic evolution

Breaking the Quantum Adiabatic Speed Limit by Jumping along Geodesics

Necessary Adiabatic Run Times in Quantum Optimization

Unstructured Adiabatic Quantum Optimization: Optimality with Limitations

Fast-forwarding quantum evolution

Lower bounds for adiabatic quantum algorithms by quantum speed limits

Geometric quantum adiabatic methods for quantum chemistry

The Burst Mode of Protostellar Accretion

Balancing the quantum speed limit and instantaneous energy cost in adiabatic quantum evolution

Quantum quench dynamics as a shortcut to adiabaticity

Quantum annealing showing an exponentially small success probability despite a constant energy gap with polynomial energy

Accelerating quantum information transfer in a three-level system via a specified intermediate Hamiltonian

Modulated time evolution for efficient variational ground-state preparation

Iterative quantum optimization with an adaptive problem Hamiltonian for the shortest vector problem

On Quantum Speedups for Nonconvex Optimization Via Quantum Tunneling Walks