XMM-Newton calibration - an overview

D. H. Lumb

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/0203276

2002-03-18

Abstract:This paper introduces the articles that describe detailed aspects of the XMM-Newton calibration. The unique calibration issues of XMM-Newton are highlighted. The original calibration requirements and aspects of the ground calibration are summarized. The life cycle of the in-orbit calibration observations, analysis and ingestion into calibration files is discussed.

Astrophysics

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

This paper attempts to solve the unique problems encountered during the in - orbit calibration process of the XMM - Newton satellite and ensure that its scientific goals can be achieved through accurate calibration. Specifically, the paper mainly focuses on the following aspects:

1. **Original Calibration Requirements**:
- The paper reviews the scientific goals of the XMM - Newton mission, which were defined 15 years before launch. During the hardware development stage, these goals were used to form a set of calibration accuracy requirements to guide the design of instrument calibration facilities and activities (Erd et al 1996).
- However, over time, changes in certain hardware performances have made some of the early - set goals no longer applicable or requiring higher precision. For example, the significant improvement in telescope resolution requires more accurate astrometric reconstruction and knowledge of the point - spread function (PSF).

2. **Status at Launch and CAL/PV Phase**:
- In fact, due to the realities of flight hardware projects, such as insufficient time and delivery delays, the ground - calibration plan could not be fully implemented. In particular, problems such as CCD failures in the PN camera flight model and some CCD replacements in the MOS camera affected the accuracy of ground - calibration.
- Therefore, in - orbit calibration activities had to rely on the knowledge accumulated during normal observations, which made the calibration progress lag behind expectations.

3. **Unique Characteristics of XMM - Newton**:
- XMM - Newton has an unprecedentedly large effective area, which means that photon statistics reveal systematic errors faster than other observatories, and also promotes the development of new astrophysical models, thus requiring better calibration.
- The coaxially operating instruments allow for cross - checks between different instruments, but also require observers to ensure the reliability of cross - calibration.
- Different filter selections and instrument modes increase the complexity of calibration activities.

4. **Calibration Life Cycle**:
- Regular and periodic calibration activities are used to check the stability of gain, wavelength scale, CTI, astrometry, etc. In addition, non - routine observations will be arranged to investigate anomalies.
- The update cycle of calibration files (CCF) is sometimes inefficient because new interfaces or tasks need to be fully tested before being released to the public version of SAS.

5. **Outlook**:
- The current calibration is sufficient to support a large number of scientific research papers based on XMM observations. Nevertheless, new scientific analyses (such as the subtle effects of iron - line details in AGN) place higher demands on calibration accuracy.
- The instrument team is committed to continuing to invest expert resources to support the continuous improvement of the understanding of hardware calibration, so as to continuously evolve throughout the mission extension period.

In summary, this paper aims to solve various calibration challenges encountered by the XMM - Newton satellite from the ground to in - orbit operation, ensuring that it can meet the growing scientific needs.