L. Andrianopoli,R. D'Auria
Abstract:We review some results on the connection among supergravity central charges, BPS states and Bekenstein-Hawking entropy. In particular, N=2 supergravity in four dimensions is studied in detail. For higher N supergravities we just give an account of the general theory specializing the discussion to the N=8 case when one half of supersymmetry is preserved. We stress the fact that for extremal supergravity black holes the entropy formula is topological, that is the entropy turns out to be a moduli independent quantity and can be written in terms of invariants of the duality group of the supergravity theory.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is to analyze the statistical distribution of prominent and socially influential nouns and adjectives in the citation statements of the Nobel Prizes in Physics and Chemistry from 1901 to 2001. Specifically, the author hopes to explore through this statistical study whether the Nobel Prizes have always adhered to Alfred Nobel's original intention, that is, to reward those who have made the most important discoveries or inventions in a certain field.
### Research Background and Purpose
Since the Nobel Prizes were first awarded in 1901, they have become one of the most prestigious awards in the scientific community. In order to evaluate whether these awards truly recognize the most important scientific contributions, the author conducted a detailed linguistic analysis of the citation statements of the Nobel Prizes in Physics and Chemistry. In particular, they focused on the usage frequencies of words with high social significance (such as "discovery", "invention", "contribution", etc.) in different historical periods (around 1950).
### Main Content
1. **Data Sources**:
- The paper used the citation statements of the Nobel Prizes in Physics (165 laureates) and Chemistry (137 laureates) from 1901 to 2001.
- The Nobel Prize in Medicine was excluded because there were only 4 citation statements that did not mention "discovery" after 1918.
2. **Statistical Methods**:
- The author counted the key nouns and adjectives that appeared in the citation statements and divided the results into two time periods: before 1950 and after 1950.
- Focused on analyzing the distribution of 21 key nouns and 5 key adjectives.
3. **Main Findings**:
- **Nouns**:
- "Discovery/discoveries" is the most frequently used noun, appearing 46 (17) times in Physics and 17 (5) times in Chemistry.
- Other common nouns include "contribution", "development", "work", etc.
- In the field of Chemistry, "work" is the most common noun, appearing 22 times, equal to the sum of "discovery" and "discoveries".
- **Adjectives**:
- "Fundamental" is the most frequently used adjective, especially frequently appearing after 1950, appearing 10 times in Physics and 7 times in Chemistry.
- Other common adjectives include "experimental", "pioneering", and "theoretical".
### Conclusion
Through this study, the author demonstrated the changes in the language characteristics of the Nobel Prizes in different historical periods, especially emphasizing the importance of words such as "discovery", "contribution", and "fundamental". This indicates that although the selection criteria of the Nobel Prizes may have changed, they still generally adhere to the principle of rewarding the most important scientific contributions.
### References
- [1] The official Nobel website provides a large number of documents about the Nobel Prizes.
- [2] The research by Zhang and Fuller provided detailed statistical data for the Nobel laureates in the field of Physics.
### Charts
The paper contains multiple histograms to show the distribution of nouns and adjectives in the fields of Physics and Chemistry, as well as the change trends in different periods.