Abstract:In digital competitive environments, organizations' ability to innovate is more than ever the key to competitive advantage. One way to cope with this increased pressure for innovation is to capitalize on employees' ability to generate new ideas and use these as building blocks for new and better products, services, and work processes. Individual innovation thus emerges as a key competence required from workers, in turn crucially affecting the way managers make employees contribute to organizational goals and assess their performance. This study draws on the process-based approach to HRM (<a href="#B9">Bowen and Ostroff, 2004</a>) suggesting that HRM practices may have a signaling effect, to address the following research question: which specific characteristics of performance appraisal are more likely to be perceived as promoting individual innovation at work? To address this issue, we carried out a survey on 865 employees working in large, multinational firms operating in digitalized sectors or industries with the potential to become digitalized. We collected data on the main characteristics of the performance appraisal systems adopted by the firm where respondents work, as perceived by employees themselves. We gathered also data on the respondents' overall perception that performance appraisal boosts innovative work behavior (IWB). Then, we employed logit analysis to test the relationship between data on performance appraisal systems and data on the effectiveness of performance appraisal as a booster of IWB. Our results reveal that, as compared to informal feedback, formal performance appraisal is more likely to reduce the perception that performance appraisal promotes individual innovation and creativity at work. In addition, we found that in the employees' perception performance appraisal focused on the achievement of pre-set, quantitative outcomes is more likely to affect positively IWB than appraisal focused on pre-defined skills that employees exhibited performing their work. However, performance assessment focused on the new competences developed by the employees has a perceived positive impact even stronger than result-oriented appraisal. Taken together, these results contribute to advance our understanding of how organizations should evaluate employees in the digitalization era.

Performance management when innovation and learning become critical performance indicators

Performance management effectiveness: lessons from world-leading firms

Key Factors in the Practice of Performance Management

When employee performance management affects individual innovation in public organizations: the role of consistency and LMX

Performance Measurement System and Relationships with Performance Results

Performance Management: A Model and Research Agenda

Reinventing Performance Management

How Does Performance Management Affect Workers? Beyond Human Resource Management and Its Critique

A review of performance measurement: Towards performance management

Performance Appraisal and Innovative Behavior in the Digital Era

A Study of Performance Measurement System Implementation in a High Volume Production Line

Performance Appraisal, Performance Management, and Firm-Level Performance: A Review, a Proposed Model, and New Directions for Future Research

How do managerial perceptions of performance feedback affect innovation?

Management innovation and firm performance: An integration of research findings

Putting the System Into Performance Management Systems: A Review and Agenda for Performance Management Research

Line managers’ AMO to manage employees’ performance: the route to effective and satisfying performance management

Steering firm performance through innovative capabilities: A contingency approach to innovation management

Performance management systems and multinational enterprises: Where we are and where we should go

Digital Transformation and Flexible Performance Management: A Systematic Literature Review of the Evolution of Performance Measurement Systems

INNOVATION STRATEGY AND THE USE OF PERFORMANCE MEASURES

An empirical multi-level analysis for achieving balance between incremental and radical innovations