Molybdenite Re–Os, titanite and garnet U–Pb dating of the Magushan skarn Cu–Mo deposit, Xuancheng district, Middle–Lower Yangtze River Metallogenic Belt

Yue Li,Feng Yuan,Simon M. Jowitt,Fangyue Wang,Xiangling Li,Yufeng Deng,Yunyue Wang,Taofa Zhou
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2020.11.013
IF: 8.9
2021-05-01
Geoscience Frontiers
Abstract:Re–Os dating of molybdenite from the Magushan deposit yielded an isochron age of 137.7 ± 2.5 Ma (MSWD = 0.43)U–Pb dating of magmatic titanite and skarn garnet yielded U–Pb ages of 136.3 ± 2.5 Ma (MSWD = 3.2) and 135.9 ± 2.7 Ma (MSWD = 2.5), respectively.Both magmatic and hydrothermal activity within the Magushan area occurred around 136 Ma, indicating a genetic link between the two consistent with spatial and paragenetic relationships.Dating of garnet and titanite can yield geochronological data in areas lacking other dateable minerals (e.g., molybdenite)These approaches are especially useful in areas with unclear relationships between mineralization and magmatism.The Magushan skarn Cu–Mo deposit is a representative example of the skarn mineralization present within the Xuancheng ore district of the Middle–Lower Yangtze River Metallogenic Belt. The precise age of an ore deposit is important for understanding the timing of mineralization relative to other geological events in an area and to fully place the formation of a mineral deposit within the geological context of other processes that occur within the study area. Here, we present new molybdenite Re–Os, titanite and andradite garnet U–Pb ages for the Magushan deposit and use these data to outline possible approaches for identifying genetic relationships in geologically complex areas. The spatial and paragenetic relationships between the intrusions, alteration, and mineralization within the study area indicates that the formation of the Magushan deposit is genetically associated with the porphyritic granodiorite. However, this is not always the case, as some areas contain complexly zoned plutons with multiple phases of intrusion or mineralization may be distal from or may not have any clear spatial relationship to a pluton. This means that it may not be possible to determine whether the mineralization formed as a result of single or multiple magmatic/hydrothermal events. As such, the approaches presented in this study provide an approach that allows the identification of any geochronological relationships between mineralization and intrusive events in areas more complex than the study area. Previously published zircon U–Pb data for mineralization-related porphyritic granodiorite yielded an age of 134.2 ± 1.2 Ma (MSWD = 1.4) whereas the Re–Os dating of molybdenite from the study area yielded an isochron age of 137.7 ± 2.5 Ma (MSWD = 0.43). The timing of the mineralizing event in the study area was further examined by the dating of magmatic accessory titanite and skarn-related andradite garnet and yielded U–Pb age of 136.3 ± 2.5 Ma (MSWD = 3.2) and 135.9 ± 2.7 Ma (MSWD = 2.5), respectively. The dating of magmatic and hydrothermal activity within the Magushan area yields ages around 136 Ma, strongly suggesting that the mineralization in this area formed as a result of the emplacement of the intrusion. The dates presented in this study also provide the first indication of the timing of mineralization within the Xuancheng district. These data provide evidence of a close relationship between the formation of the mineralization within the Xuancheng district and the Early Cretaceous magmatism that occurred in this area. This in turn suggests that other Early Cretaceous intrusive rocks within this region are likely to be associated with mineralization and should be considered highly prospective for future mineral exploration. This study also indicates that the dating of garnet and titanite can also provide reliable geochronological data and evidence of the timing of mineralization and magmatism, respectively, in areas lacking other dateable minerals (e.g., molybdenite) or where the relationship between mineralization and magmatism is unclear, for example in areas with multiple stages of magmatism, with complexly zoned plutons, and with distal skarn mineralization.Re–Os dating of molybdenite from the Magushan deposit yielded an isochron age of 137.7 ± 2.5 Ma (MSWD = 0.43) with dating of magmatic titanite and skarn-related garnet yielding U–Pb ages of 136.3 ± 2.5 (MSWD = 3.2) and 135.9 ± 2.7 Ma (MSWD = 2.5), respectively. These data indicate that the deposit formed around 136 Ma. The U–Pb dating of garnet and titanite in this study demonstrates that these approaches yield reliable geochronological data that can be used to provide good evidence of the timing of mineralization in areas that lack other dateable minerals (e.g., molybdenite) or where the links between mineralization and magmatism are unclear.<span class="display"><span><ol class="links-for-figure"><li><a class="anchor download-link u-font-sans" href="https://ars.els-cdn.com/content/image/1-s2.0-S1674987120302565-ga1_lrg.jpg"><span class="anchor-text">Download : <span class="download-link-title">Download high-res image (172KB)</span></span></a></li><li><a class="anchor download-link u-font-sans" href="https://ars.els-cdn.com/content/image/1-s2.0-S167 <p>-Abstract Truncated-</p>
geosciences, multidisciplinary
What problem does this paper attempt to address?