Phase I/II study of nivolumab plus lenvatinib for advanced biliary tract cancer (JCOG1808/NCCH1817, SNIPE)

M. Ueno,C. Morizane,M. Ikeda,M. Ozaka,F. Nagashima,T. Kataoka,J. Mizusawa,A. Ohba,S. Kobayashi,H. Imaoka,A. Kasuga,N. Okano,Y. Nagasaka,M. Sasaki,J. Furuse,T. Okusaka
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esmoop.2024.103919
IF: 6.883
2024-10-02
ESMO Open
Abstract:Highlights • Nivolumab plus lenvatinib had a manageable safety profile for BTC treatment. • Nivolumab plus lenvatinib had limited efficacy as a second-line BTC treatment. • Efficacy may depend on the presence or absence of biliary tract infections and a history of antibiotic use. Background Although cisplatin plus gemcitabine and other combinations have improved the survival of advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC), high unmet medical needs remain. This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of nivolumab plus lenvatinib in the second-line treatment for advanced BTC. Patients and methods Nivolumab (240 mg) was administered biweekly. Phase I determined the recommended phase II dose of lenvatinib (20 mg or 14 mg). In phase II, the primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints were disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. The planned sample size was 32 patients with a power of 80%, a one-sided alpha error of 5%, threshold ORR of 10%, and expected ORR of 30%. Results In phase I, the recommended dose of lenvatinib was determined to be 20 mg in six patients, with one dose-limiting toxicity (myocarditis). In phase II, we enrolled 26 patients. ORR, DCR, and median OS and PFS were 9.4% [90% confidence interval (CI) 2.6% to 22.5%], 53.1% (95% CI 34.7% to 70.9%), and 6.4 months (95% CI 4.9-9.7 months) and 2.5 months (95% CI 1.5-4.1 months), respectively. No response was observed in patients with the usage of antibiotics. The grade 3 or 4 adverse events were hypertension (59.4%) and biliary tract infection (37.5%). Rash (28.1%) and hypothyroidism (21.9%) were observed as immune-mediated adverse events of any grade. Conclusions Nivolumab plus lenvatinib had a manageable safety in advanced BTC, but its efficacy in the second-line treatment was limited.
oncology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?