P4770Antithrombotic Challenge in the Clinical Dilemma of High-Risk Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: One-Year Result from ChiOTEAF Registry
Y. T. Guo,Y. Wang,Y. Chen,G. Y. H. Lip
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehz745.1146
IF: 39.3
2019-01-01
European Heart Journal
Abstract:Abstract Background The antithrombotic treatment is the main goal of management on atrial fibrillation (AF). However, the optimal thrombophylaxis still remains the problem in the “high-risk” population, such as the elderly, with renal/liver dysfunction, malignancy, stent implantation, etc. Objectives The present study aims to explore the optimal antithrombotic strategy in a “high-risk” population with multiple comorbidities. Methods The ChiOTEAF (Ethic approval number of Central Medical Ethic Committee of General PLA Hospital: S2014–065–01) is a prospectively, multi-center (44 research centers), real-world registry across China. The protocol was seen in BMJ Open (Guo Y, et al. 2018). A Cox proportional hazard model analysis was performed for the outcome of antithrombotic therapy among this high-risk population. Results 6148 patients with AF (mean age 74 years old, female 39.4%), were enrolled into ChiOTEAF study between Oct 2014 to Dec 2018. The use of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs), warfarin, and antiplatelet were 1444 (23.5%), 1300 (21.1%), and 2521 (41.0%), respectively, in this high-risk AF population. During one-year follow-up, there were 186 (3.0%) all-cause death. In this AF cohort, the patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD)/liver disease were 878 (14.3%), with malignancy were 555 (9.0%), with prior thromboembolism (TE) were 1538 (25%), with prior haemorrhage were 348 (5.7%), and current anemia were 859 (14.0%), respectively. Stent implantation (coronary artery, aortic or peripheral artery) were 671 (10.9%). CHA2DS2-VASc and HAD-BLED scores (mean±standard deviation) were 3.8±1.7, and 2.0±1.1, respectively. Among the above “clinical dilemma”, the antiplatelet use was common in patients with CKD/Liver disease and stent implantation (43.5%, 56.9%, respectively, p<0.05), the oral anticoagulants (OACs) combined with antiplatelet was most seen in patients with stent implantation (15.4%, p<0.05), OACs alone were highest in patients with prior TE (38.1%, p<0.05), while patients with malignancy and prior bleeding far less received any antithrombotic drugs (41.8%, 31.3%, respectively, p<0.05) (Figure 1). However, after adjusting baseline characteristics, OACs reduced the risk for all-cause death (hazard ratio, HR, 95% confidential interval, CI) for the patients with CKD/liver disease (HR, 95% CI, 0.28, 0.11–0.69, p=0.006), and for patients with prior TE (HR, 95% CI, 0.43, 0.21–0.91, p=0.028), respectively. Conclusion Although suboptimal anticoagulants were common in the “high-risk” AF patients, OACs demonstrated the benefit for AF patients with CKD/liver disease, etc., while more evidences would be needed to optimise the antithrombotic strategy in different complex clinical settings. Acknowledgement/Funding The study was supported by Beijing Natural Science Foundation (Z1411ehz745.11462114050) and National Natural Science Foundation of China (H2501)