Abstract:The Safe Drinking Water Act Amendments of 1996 required U.S. utilities to report on drinking water quality to their customers annually, beginning in fall 1999, on the assumption that such reports would alert them to quality problems and perhaps mobilize pressure for improvement. A random sample of New Jersey customers read alternative versions of a water quality report, in an experiment on reactions to water quality information under U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) rules. Experiment design was 2 x 3 + 1: two versions each--one with, one without, a violation of a health standard--of a report that was (1) Qualitative (without water quality numbers, thus not meeting USEPA rules); (2) Basic, with minimal information meeting the rules; or (3) Extended, adding reading aids and utility performance information; plus a control instrument without any hypothetical report. Results of ANOVA suggest the reports will have less effect than hoped or feared. These manipulations were successful: people reading the Qualitative versions were less likely to say that the report gave the amounts of substances found in the water, and those reading Violation versions were more likely to report a violation of a health standard. The main differences in responses to the report involved the judged adequacy of the information, and to a lesser extent responses on a Concern scale (constructed from measures of concern, judged risk, clean-up intentions, distrust of utility information, and doubt that the utility was doing all it could to improve water quality). Overall judgments of water quality and utility performance did not change, either relative to the controls or in before versus after responses. Qualitative reports performed worse than others, confirming the decision to have utilities report actual contaminant levels. Extended reports did only slightly better than the Basic versions on these measures. Many respondents had trouble identifying the presence or absence of substance amounts or violations, despite their seeming obviousness (e.g., in a "bottom line" summary on the front page of each report), suggesting many were not processing this information carefully. However, the pattern of responses for those who accurately identified the presence or absence of substance amounts or violations did not differ substantially from that for the group as a whole. Generic risk beliefs (serious local environmental problems; lack of control over risks to one's health) dominated demographic variables, attitudes toward utility water quality or trustworthiness, and the content and format of water quality reports in influencing concern about drinking water quality. Previous empirical and theoretical evidence for lack of change in public risk attitudes due to one-time or infrequent communications--e.g., role of personal experience, perseverance of prior trust or distrust--seems to be confirmed for annual water quality reports.

The effect of a brief educational programme for improving attitudes about purified recycled water

Not All Information is Informative: An Exploration of Educational Content on Recycled Potable Water Knowledge and Acceptance

Perception and acceptance towards water reuse in the Southeast United States: A public survey

Evaluating the dynamic psychological and behavioral changes of water-saving in public buildings under effective interventions

Exploration of public stereotypes of supply-and-demand characteristics of recycled water infrastructure - Evidence from an event-related potential experiment in Xi'an, China

Promoting Water Conservation Based on the Matching Effect of Regulatory Focus and Emotion

Saving water for the future: Public awareness of water usage and water quality

Do reports on drinking water quality affect customers' concerns? Experiments in report content

Environmental and socioeconomic aspects related to the acceptance of Direct Potable Reuse in a metropolitan city in Brazil

Effect-based evaluation of water quality in a system of indirect reuse of wastewater for drinking water production

Knowledge regarding reverse osmosis (R.O) waste water utilization among general public in urban areas

Perception of drinking water safety and factors influencing acceptance and sustainability of a water quality intervention in rural southern India

Psychological aspects of the rejection of recycled water: Contamination, purification and disgust

Public Perception and Acceptability of Reclaimed Water: the Case of Shandong Province, China

Private well water stewardship in rural Georgia

Enhancing Pupils’ Pro-environmental Knowledge, Attitudes, and Behaviours Toward Plastic Recycling: A Quasi-experimental Study in Primary Schools

Effects of Environmental Education on Young Children’s Water-Saving Behaviors in Japan

Supporters and Opponents of Potable Recycled Water: Culture and Cognition in the Toowoomba Referendum

Determinants of Intention to Adopt Recycled Water: Evidence from Four High-Water-Stress Provinces in China

Analysis of Social Attitude to the New End Use of Recycled Water for Household Laundry in Australia by the Regression Models

Exploring Educators’ Environmental Education Attitudes and Efficacy: Insights Gleaned from a Texas Wetland Academy