Abstract:The sometimes vast gap between live results and paper portfolio performance is caused in part by trading costs, discontinuous trading, and missed trades or other frictions, along with asset management fees. Smart beta and factor strategies are not exempt from this sort of "implementation shortfall." This paper provides new evidence on the efficacy of prioritizing transactions so as to focus portfolio turnover on the trades that offer the strongest signals and hence the highest potential performance impact. Rebalancing filters of this sort can capture much of the factor premia for a long-only paper portfolio while cutting turnover and trading costs relative to a fully rebalanced portfolio.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The paper attempts to address the issue that in actual investments, due to factors such as transaction costs and market frictions, there is a significant gap between the actual performance of factor strategies and theoretical expectations. Specifically, the paper focuses on how to reduce transaction costs and improve the performance of factor strategies through priority trading methods.
### Background of the Paper
1. **Gap between Theory and Practice**:
- Academic research usually assumes that markets are continuous, have unlimited liquidity, and ignore revaluation alpha.
- In actual investments, frictions such as transaction costs, discontinuous trading, and missed trades lead to "implementation shortfall," where actual performance falls short of theoretical expectations.
2. **Challenges of Factor Strategies**:
- Factor strategies (such as value, momentum, profitability, etc.) may theoretically bring higher returns or improve portfolio risk attributes.
- However, these strategies need to consider transaction costs in actual application; otherwise, the expected returns may not be realized.
### Research Objectives
1. **Reduce Transaction Costs**:
- By using priority trading methods, concentrate trades on stocks with the strongest signals to reduce unnecessary trades and lower transaction costs.
2. **Improve Factor Strategy Performance**:
- By optimizing trading strategies, ensure the maximization of factor premium capture within a limited number of trades, thereby improving the overall performance of factor strategies.
### Methods
1. **Priority Trading Methods**:
- **Priority-Best**: Prioritize buying and selling stocks based on signal strength until the trading limit is reached.
- **Proportional Rebalancing**: Conduct all trades proportionally to meet trading limits.
- **Priority-Worst**: Intentionally trade in the opposite order, prioritizing stocks with the weakest signals.
2. **Non-Calendar Rebalancing**:
- For high-frequency trading strategies such as momentum factors, use non-fixed time rebalancing methods, rebalancing when the deviation between the current portfolio and the target portfolio exceeds a preset threshold.
### Results
1. **Advantages of the Priority-Best Method**:
- The Priority-Best method generally outperforms Proportional Rebalancing and Priority-Worst methods, especially in high trading frequency strategies like momentum factors.
- By reducing unnecessary trades, the Priority-Best method can significantly lower transaction costs while maintaining a high factor premium.
2. **Feasibility of Practical Application**:
- The research results indicate that by optimizing rebalancing strategies, investors can better capture factor premiums in actual investments, improving the overall performance of their portfolios.
### Conclusion
The paper empirically demonstrates the effectiveness of priority trading methods, particularly in reducing transaction costs and improving factor strategy performance. This has important implications for actual investors, helping them better achieve theoretically expected returns in real investments.