A Quantitative Comparison of Algorithmic and Machine Learning Network Flow Throughput Prediction

Abstract:Applications ranging from video meetings, live streaming, video games, autonomous vehicle operations, and algorithmic trading heavily rely on low latency communication to operate optimally. A solution to fully support this growing demand for low latency is called dual-queue active queue management (AQM). Dual-queue AQM’s functionality is reduced without network traffic throughput prediction. Perhaps due to the current popularity of machine learning, there is a trend to adopt machine learning models over traditional algorithmic throughput prediction approaches without empirical support. This study tested the effectiveness of machine learning as compared to time series forecasting algorithms in predicting per-flow network traffic throughput on two separate datasets. Autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA), a deep neural network (DNN) architecture, and a long short-term memory (LSTM) neural network architecture were used to predict future network throughput in two different datasets. Dataset one was used in establishing the initial performance benchmarks. Findings were replicated with a second dataset. The results showed that all three models performed well. ANOVA failed to demonstrate a statistically significant advantage of machine learning over the algorithmic model. From dataset one, ANOVA F = 0.138 and p = 0.983. From dataset two, F = 0.087 and p = 0.994. The coefficient of determination tested the fit of models in the two datasets. The r squared value ranged
Computer Science
What problem does this paper attempt to address?