Temporal and Spatial Variations in Landscape Habitat Quality under Multiple Land-Use/Land-Cover Scenarios Based on the PLUS-InVEST Model in the Yangtze River Basin, China

Ning He,Wenxian Guo,Hongxiang Wang,Long Yu,Siyuan Cheng,Lintong Huang,Xuyang Jiao,Wenxiong Chen,Haotong Zhou
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/land12071338
IF: 3.905
2023-07-05
Land
Abstract:Despite the Yangtze River Basin (YRB)'s abundant land and forestry resources, there is still a dearth of research on forecasting habitat quality changes resulting from various geographic and environmental factors that drive landscape transformations. Hence, this study concentrates on the YRB as the focal area, with the aim of utilizing the Patch Landscape Upscaling Simulation model (PLUS) and the habitat quality model to scrutinize the spatial distribution of landscape patterns and the evolution of HQ under four scenarios: the natural development scenario (NDS), farmland protection scenario (CPS), urban development scenario (UDS), and ecological protection scenario (EPS), spanning from the past to 2030. Our results show that (1) from 2000 to 2020, the construction land in the YRB expanded at a high dynamic rate of 47.86% per year, leading to a decrease of 32,776 km2 in the cultivated land area; (2) the UDS had the most significant expansion of construction land, followed by the NDS, CPS, and EPS, which had higher proportions of ecologically used land such as forests and grasslands; (3) from 2000 to 2020, the HQ index ranged from 0.211 to 0.215 (low level), showing a slight upward trend, with the most drastic changes occurring in the low-level areas (−0.49%); (4) the EPS had the highest HQ (0.231), followed by the CPS (0.215), with the CPS increasing the HQ proportion of the lower-level areas by 2.64%; (5) and in addition to government policies, NDVI, DEM, GDP, and population were also significant factors affecting landscape pattern and changes in habitat quality.
environmental studies
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The key problem that this paper attempts to solve is the spatio - temporal variation characteristics of landscape habitat quality (HQ) in the Yangtze River Basin (YRB) under multiple land use/cover change (LUCC) scenarios. Specifically, the study aims to: 1. **Establish models and simulate landscape pattern and HQ changes under different scenarios**: - Based on historical LUCC patterns, construct the CA - Markov - PLUS model and the In - VEST - HQ model. - Simulate the landscape pattern and HQ changes in 2030 under the natural development scenario (NDS), the cropland protection scenario (CPS), the urban development scenario (UDS), and the ecological protection scenario (EPS). 2. **Analyze the temporal and spatial fluctuations of HQ**: - Compare the change trends of HQ under different scenarios and explore the driving mechanisms behind them. - Study the impacts of factors such as government policies, NDVI (Normalized Difference Vegetation Index), DEM (Digital Elevation Model), GDP, and population on landscape pattern and HQ changes. ### Research Background Although the Yangtze River Basin is rich in land and forest resources, research on predicting the impact of landscape transformation driven by different geographical and environmental factors on habitat quality is still insufficient. Therefore, this study focuses on the Yangtze River Basin and uses the Patch Landscape Upscaling Simulation (PLUS) model and the habitat quality model to analyze the spatial distribution of landscape patterns and the evolution of HQ under four scenarios (NDS, CPS, UDS, EPS). ### Key Findings 1. **From 2000 to 2020, the construction land in the Yangtze River Basin expanded at a dynamic growth rate of 47.86% per year, resulting in a reduction of 32,776 square kilometers in the cultivated land area**. 2. **Among the four scenarios, the expansion of urban development is the most significant (UDS), followed by the natural development scenario (NDS), while the cropland protection scenario (CPS) and the ecological protection scenario (EPS) have a higher proportion of ecological land, such as forests and grasslands**. 3. **From 2000 to 2020, the HQ index ranged from 0.211 to 0.215 (low level) and showed a slightly upward trend, with the most drastic change in the low - level area (- 0.49%)**. 4. **The ecological protection scenario (EPS) has the highest HQ (0.231), followed by the cropland protection scenario (CPS), and CPS increased the proportion of HQ in the low - level area by 2.64%**. 5. **In addition to government policies, NDVI, DEM, GDP, and population are also important factors affecting landscape pattern and HQ changes**. Through these analyses, the study provides a scientific basis for future ecological protection and sustainable land use, especially in the core areas of large river basins, emphasizing the impact of different development scenarios on habitat quality and their potential driving mechanisms.