Pengjie Liu,Chaoqun Liu,Kai Yang,Mingjie Zhang,Fei Gao,Binbin Mao,Huang Li,Qiangling Duan,Qingsong Wang
Abstract:<p>Lithium ion batteries (LIBs) have been widely used in various electronic devices, but numerous accidents related to LIBs frequently occur due to its flammable materials. In this work, the thermal runaway (TR) process and the fire behaviors of 22 Ah LiFePO<sub>4</sub>/graphite batteries are investigated using an in situ calorimeter. The cells are over heated using a heating plate. The heating plate is utilized to simulate the abuse process triggered by TR of the adjacent battery in modules. The fire behaviors, heat release rate (HRR), temperature characteristics of cell surface and flame, mass loss, voltage variation and gas release are obtained. For 100% state of charge (SOC) cells, the fire is blown out at the TR process. Jet fire is only observed for 50% and 100% SOC cells and the average trigger temperatures of TR are 198.6 and 184.8 °C for 50 and 100% SOC batteries, respectively. The state of charge of the cell has a significant influence on the peak HRR, total heat release (THR) and mass loss. HF and H<sub>2</sub> are detected during combustion process. The productions of CO and HF increase as the increasing SOCs, which have much greater toxicity. And that of 100% SOC cells is much larger due to the flame being blown out. The relationship between TR and fire behaviors is revealed. Two failure modes are proposed to describe the fire behaviors at different phases. Based on the energy balance of the cell, the mechanism and phenomenon related to SOCs are discussed. From the safety perspective, several proposals are advanced for application and fire protection.</p>
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
### Problems the paper attempts to solve
This paper aims to study and analyze the thermal runaway (TR) and its fire behavior of lithium iron phosphate batteries (LiFePO₄ batteries) under overheating conditions. Specifically, the paper focuses on the following issues:
1. **Relationship between thermal runaway and fire behavior**: Through experiments, explore the fire characteristics exhibited by batteries at different states of charge (SOC) during the thermal runaway process, including flame shape, heat release rate (HRR), temperature change, mass loss, voltage change, and gas release.
2. **Influence of different SOC on fire behavior**: It has been found that SOC significantly affects the peak heat release rate (peak HRR), total heat release (THR), and mass loss. For example, a 100% SOC battery will produce more violent jet flames during the thermal runaway process, and it also produces more toxic gases (such as CO and HF).
3. **Fire hazard assessment**: Through quantitative analysis of combustion products (especially toxic gases such as CO and HF), assess the hazards of battery fires at different SOCs, providing a scientific basis for the safe application of batteries and fire protection.
4. **Propose improvement measures**: Based on the experimental results, from a safety perspective, several suggestions for the application of large - capacity LIBs and fire protection are proposed to reduce the fire risk.
### Overview of the main content of the paper
- **Introduction**: Introduces the wide application of lithium - ion batteries (LIBs) in portable electronic devices, electric vehicles (EVs), hybrid electric vehicles (HEVs), and grid - energy storage, as well as their potential fire and explosion risks.
- **Experimental part**:
- Use a heating plate to simulate the abuse process caused by the thermal runaway of adjacent batteries.
- Measure the dynamic parameters of batteries at different SOCs (0%, 50%, 75%, 100%) during the thermal runaway process, including HRR, surface temperature, flame temperature, mass loss, voltage change, and gas release.
- **Results and discussion**:
- Analyze the combustion behavior at different SOCs and reveal the relationship between thermal runaway and fire behavior.
- Study the temperature changes at different SOCs, especially the changes in battery surface temperature and flame temperature.
- Analyze in detail the heat release rate (HRR) at different SOCs and explain the reasons for its changes.
- Conduct a quantitative analysis of the gases released during the combustion process (such as CO₂, CO, HF, and H₂) and assess their toxicity threats.
- Discuss the mass loss at different SOCs and its impact on fire hazards.
- **Conclusion**:
- Propose explanations for the mechanisms and phenomena of thermal runaway and fire behavior of large - capacity LIBs.
- Based on the energy balance equation, discuss the internal reactions and external manifestations of batteries at different SOCs.
- Propose several improvement suggestions to improve battery safety and reduce fire risks.
### Key formulas
The energy balance equation involved in the paper is as follows:
\[
\frac{\partial T}{\partial t}=\frac{Q_{\text{heater}} + Q_{\text{reac}}+ Q_{\text{elec}}+ Q_{\text{flame}}- Q_{\text{conv}}- Q_{\text{rad}}- Q_{\text{vent}}- Q_{\text{boil}}- Q_{\text{eje}}}{\rho C_p}
\]
where:
- \(Q_{\text{heater}}\) is the heat input from the heater
- \(Q_{\text{reac}}\) is the heat released by the internal exothermic reaction
- \(Q_{\text{elec}}\) is the Joule heat generated by the internal short - circuit
- \(Q_{\text{flame}}\) is the heat generated by the flame radiation
- \(Q_{\text{conv}}\) is the convective heat dissipation
- \(Q_{\text{rad}}\) is the radiative heat dissipation
- \(Q_{\text{vent}}\) is the exhaust heat dissipation
- \(Q_{\text{boil}}\)