Abstract:The concept of standardized patients (SPs) was first introduced in the 1960s by Dr. Howard Barrows of the University of Southern California and has been applied in medical school education since that time. This practice has allowed medical students to practice skills on live persons who are teachers rather than on real patients, who may be endangered by their emerging skills. Previous studies supported the use of SPs but did not measure whether they improved clinical competence or students' confidence in their skills. This literature review evaluated whether current medical education literature supports or refutes the use of SPs compared to other modalities such as simulated patients (SiPs) and virtual reality (VR) in the improvement of student confidence, clinical performance, and interpersonal communication skills. The research questions posed for this review were as follows: do medical students in their first two years of education who have practiced skills using SPs have more self-confidence in their ability to perform skills on real patients than those students who did not use SPs, do medical students in their third and fourth years of medical school have higher clinical competency with sensitive patient examinations after using SPs in their first two years of medical education than those students who did not use SPs, and do medical students who have used SPs for discussing sensitive issues have better interpersonal skills when they encounter real patients in the clinical setting than those who have not used SPs? The methodology for this descriptive, systematic review of the literature was organized using a Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) flowchart to describe how articles were collected and synthesized to evaluate the variables under study. The results of this study revealed that students learned the most when SPs were used because they were able to teach students the skills that they needed in a safe learning environment. Medical students performing sensitive patient examinations with SPs learned not only how to perform the examinations but also how to improve their communication with patients. Students and residents reported increased confidence and clinical competence when performing new skills with SPs rather than with peer practice, virtual reality, or real patients in a clinical setting. Although the utilization of SPs has been studied in multiple ways and found to be a powerful tool in the education of undergraduate medical students and interns, there is still much study to be done to address the human needs of real patients. Gaps in this literature included small sample sizes, a lack of standardized assessment tools, and the need to include a multidisciplinary approach that addresses cultural awareness and appreciation. The authors found limited studies analyzing the effect the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic had on the use of SPs in medical school education. Continued scientific inquiry in post-pandemic medical education is an essential component for dissemination as most schools have reintroduced the use of SPs, which strengthens the concept that their use is superior to the other simulation methods used when SPs were not available.

A systematic review of the use of unannounced standardized patients (USPs) in clinical settings: A call for more detailed quality and fidelity descriptions and expansion to new areas

Using Unannounced Standardized Patients to Assess Clinician Telehealth and Communication Skills at an Urban Student Health Center

Standardized Patients in Medical Education: A Review of the Literature

A systematic review of the use of simulated patient methodology in pharmacy practice research from 2006 to 2016

The Use of Standardized Patients to Teach Communication Skills—A Systematic Review

Current State and Proposal of Best Practices of Standardized Patients for Spanish-Language Objective Structured Clinical Encounters in US Medical Schools

Training Students to Serve as Standardized Patients in an Objective Structured Clinical Examination is Feasible: A Mixed-Methods Study

Applying standardized patients to augment clinical skills in clinical medical students’ national proficiency test

Patient‐Reported Experience Measures in Adult Inpatient Settings: A Systematic Review

Global trends and hotpots in standardised patients research in the last 30 years: A bibliometric analysis

Analysis of virtual standardized patients for assessing clinical fundamental skills of medical students: a prospective study

An Integrative Review of the State of POLST Science: What Do We Know and Where Do We Go?

Validity of patients' online reviews at direct-to-consumer teleconsultation platforms: a protocol for a cross-sectional study using unannounced standardised patients

Practice to Perform: Formative Mini-Skills Checkoffs Prior to High-Stakes Summative Assessment for Practice-Ready Students

Instruments to evaluate non-technical skills during high fidelity simulation: A systematic review

Virtual Standardized Patients for Mental Health Education

Impact of Standardized Patients on First Semester Nursing Students Self-Confidence, Satisfaction, and Communication in a Simulated Clinical Case

The Agreement Between Virtual Patients and Unannounced Standardized Patients in Evaluating Primary Healthcare Quality: A Multicentred, Cross-Sectional Study in Seven Provinces of China

Use of simulated patients to develop communication skills in nursing education: An integrative review

How the CAHPS Clinician and Group Patient Experience Survey Data Have Been Used in Research: A Systematic Review

Perceptions of a longitudinal standardized patient experience by standardized patients, medical students, and faculty