Structure of the p53 degradation complex from HPV16

John C. K. Wang,Hannah T. Baddock,Amirhossein Mafi,Ian T. Foe,Matthew Bratkowski,Ting-Yu Lin,Zena D. Jensvold,Magdalena Preciado López,David Stokoe,Dan Eaton,Qi Hao,Aaron H. Nile
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-45920-w
IF: 16.6
2024-02-28
Nature Communications
Abstract:Abstract Human papillomavirus (HPV) is a significant contributor to the global cancer burden, and its carcinogenic activity is facilitated in part by the HPV early protein 6 (E6), which interacts with the E3-ligase E6AP, also known as UBE3A, to promote degradation of the tumor suppressor, p53. In this study, we present a single-particle cryoEM structure of the full-length E6AP protein in complex with HPV16 E6 (16E6) and p53, determined at a resolution of ~3.3 Å. Our structure reveals extensive protein-protein interactions between 16E6 and E6AP, explaining their picomolar binding affinity. These findings shed light on the molecular basis of the ternary complex, which has been pursued as a potential therapeutic target for HPV-driven cervical, anal, and oropharyngeal cancers over the last two decades. Understanding the structural and mechanistic underpinnings of this complex is crucial for developing effective therapies to combat HPV-induced cancers. Our findings may help to explain why previous attempts to disrupt this complex have failed to generate therapeutic modalities and suggest that current strategies should be reevaluated.
multidisciplinary sciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The paper aims to address the following issues: 1. **Reveal the interaction mechanism between HPV16 E6, E6AP, and p53**: The study elucidates the 3D structure of the complex formed by HPV16 E6 protein, E6AP (also known as UBE3A), and the p53 tumor suppressor protein using single-particle cryo-electron microscopy (cryoEM) technology, with a resolution of approximately 3.3 Å. This structure reveals extensive protein-protein interactions between 16E6 and E6AP, explaining their picomolar binding affinity. 2. **Elucidate the molecular basis of the complex**: The study found that the interaction interface between 16E6 and E6AP is significantly larger than the previously reported LXXLL peptide interaction area, extending to approximately 2,361 Ų and contributing about −13.23 kcal/mol of binding energy. These findings help to understand the importance of the complex as a potential therapeutic target and explain why past drug development efforts targeting this complex have failed. 3. **Validate the structure-function relationship**: By rationally designing mutants and conducting experimental validation, the researchers confirmed the importance of specific amino acid sites in maintaining the high-affinity interaction between 16E6 and E6AP. These mutations not only affected binding affinity but also influenced the efficiency of p53 ubiquitination in vitro. In summary, this study provides new insights into the development of effective therapies against HPV-induced cancers by elucidating the structure and functional characteristics of the complex.