Abstract:It is known that in a certain case, the secondary Bjerknes force, which is a radiation force acting between pulsating bubbles, changes, e.g., from attraction to repulsion as the bubbles approach each other. In this paper, a theoretical discussion of this phenomenon for two spherical bubbles is described. The present theory based on analysis of the transition frequencies of interacting bubbles [M. Ida, Phys. Lett. A 297, 210 (2002)] provides an interpretation, different from previous ones (e.g., by Doinikov and Zavtrak [Phys. Fluids 7, 1923 (1995)]), of the phenomenon. It is shown, for example, that the reversal that occurs when one bubble is smaller and another is larger than a resonance size is due to the second-highest transition frequency of the smaller bubble, which cannot be obtained using traditional natural-frequency analysis.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
### What problem does this paper attempt to solve?
This paper attempts to explain the phenomenon of the sign reversal (from attraction to repulsion or vice versa) of the secondary Bjerknes force between two pulsating bubbles. Specifically, the author proposes a new explanation, which is different from the previous explanations based on natural frequency analysis.
#### Background and problem description
In a sound field, two pulsating bubbles will experience an interaction force called the secondary Bjerknes force. This force is an attractive force when the bubbles pulsate synchronously and a repulsive force when they are asynchronous. It is known that in some cases, when the bubbles approach each other, the sign of this force will reverse. For example, Zabolotskaya et al. once predicted this phenomenon through a linear - coupled oscillator model and believed that it was caused by the change in the natural frequencies of the bubbles.
However, existing theoretical and experimental results show that this sign reversal is not solely caused by the change in natural frequencies. The research of Doinikov and Zavtrak et al. also supports this view, but they assume that the natural frequency increases as the distance decreases, which is inconsistent with the results predicted by the classical natural frequency theory.
#### Main contributions of the paper
The author of this paper proposes a new explanation based on the "transition frequency". The transition frequency refers to the frequency at which the driving frequency makes the phase difference of bubble pulsation be π/2 (or 3π/2). The author finds that in addition to the natural frequency, there are other transition frequencies, and these frequencies can also cause sign reversals. Specifically:
1. **Existence of transition frequencies**: For each bubble, there are three transition frequencies, of which the lowest one decreases as the bubbles approach each other, and the other two increase.
2. **Reasons for sign reversal**: Sign reversal occurs not only at the natural frequency but also at other transition frequencies, especially at the second - highest transition frequency.
3. **Consistency**: This explanation is consistent with the classical natural frequency theory because the transition frequencies include the natural frequency.
#### Conclusion
By introducing the concept of transition frequency, this paper provides a more accurate explanation, solves the inconsistency problems in existing theories, and can better explain the phenomena observed in experiments. In addition, the author also verifies the correctness of the theoretical results through numerical simulation.
#### Formula summary
- Natural frequency formula:
\[
(\omega_{10}^2 - \omega^2)(\omega_{20}^2 - \omega^2)-\frac{R_{10}R_{20}}{D^2}\omega^4\approx0
\]
where \(\omega_{10}\) and \(\omega_{20}\) are the partial natural angular frequencies of the bubbles, and \(D\) is the distance between the centers of the bubbles.
- Transition frequency formula:
\[
H_1F + M_2G = 0
\]
where \(H_1 = L_2+\frac{R_{20}}{D}\omega^2\), \(F = L_1L_2-\frac{R_{10}R_{20}}{D^2}\omega^4\), \(G = L_1M_2 + L_2M_1\), \(L_1=\omega_{10}^2 - \omega^2\), \(L_2=\omega_{20}^2 - \omega^2\), \(M_1=\delta_1\omega\), \(M_2=\delta_2\omega\).
In this way, this paper proposes a more comprehensive and accurate explanation for understanding the phenomenon of the sign reversal of the secondary Bjerknes force.