Improving the mass determination of Galactic Cepheids

G. Bono,W.P. Gieren,M. Marconi,P. Fouque',F. Caputo
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/323834
2001-08-16
Abstract:We have selected a sample of Galactic Cepheids for which accurate estimates of radii, distances, and photometric parameters are available. The comparison between their pulsation masses, based on new Period-Mass-Radius (PMR) relations, and their evolutionary masses, based on both optical and NIR Color-Magnitude (CM) diagrams, suggests that pulsation masses are on average of the order of 10% smaller than the evolutionary masses. Current pulsation masses show, at fixed radius, a strongly reduced dispersion when compared with values published in <a class="link-external link-http" href="http://literature.The" rel="external noopener nofollow">this http URL</a> increased precision in the pulsation masses is due to the fact that our predicted PMR relations based on nonlinear, convective Cepheid models present smaller standard deviations than PMR relations based on linear models. At the same time, the empirical radii of our Cepheid sample are typically accurate at the 5% level. Our evolutionary mass determinations are based on stellar models constructed by neglecting the effect of mass-loss during the He burning phase. Therefore, the difference between pulsation and evolutionary masses could be intrinsic and does not necessarily imply a problem with either evolutionary and/or nonlinear pulsation models. The marginal evidence of a trend in the difference between evolutionary and pulsation masses when moving from short to long-period Cepheids is also briefly discussed. The main finding of our investigation is that the long-standing Cepheid mass discrepancy seems now resolved at the 10% level either if account for canonical or mild convective core overshooting evolutionary models.
Astrophysics
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
This paper attempts to solve the problem of mass determination of classical Cepheids in the Milky Way, especially the difference between pulsation mass and evolutionary mass. Specifically, the article focuses on the following aspects: 1. **Comparison between pulsation mass and evolutionary mass**: - **Pulsation mass**: Calculated based on the new Period - Mass - Radius (PMR) relationship. - **Evolutionary mass**: Determined based on optical and near - infrared (NIR) Color - Magnitude Diagrams (CMDs). 2. **Difference between pulsation mass and evolutionary mass**: - Early studies showed that the pulsation mass is approximately 50% smaller than the evolutionary mass. By introducing new radiative opacities (such as OPAL and OP), this difference has been alleviated, but not completely resolved. 3. **Improved mass estimation**: - The paper re - evaluates the pulsation mass and evolutionary mass of a sample of classical Cepheids with accurate radius, distance, and luminosity parameters. - The results show that the current pulsation mass estimation accuracy has been significantly improved, with a small standard deviation, especially on the basis of the non - linear convection model. 4. **Investigation of the causes of mass difference**: - The article explores whether this difference may be caused by mass loss during the helium - burning stage of stars. If the mass loss during the helium - burning stage is ignored, the evolutionary mass may be systematically overestimated. - A hypothesis is proposed that Cepheids may experience about 10% mass loss during the helium - burning stage, which can explain the difference between pulsation mass and evolutionary mass. 5. **Conclusion**: - The study found that through the new PMR relationship and more accurate observational data, the long - standing difference between pulsation mass and evolutionary mass has been reduced to within 10%. - This result indicates that significant progress has been made in current theoretical models and observational data, but further research is still needed to verify the mass - loss hypothesis. In summary, this paper aims to solve the long - standing difference between the pulsation mass and evolutionary mass of Cepheids in the Milky Way through improved theoretical models and more accurate observational data, and proposes a possible mass - loss mechanism as an explanation.