Cosmology as seen from Venice

Lawrence M. Krauss

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/0106149

2001-06-08

Abstract:The flat matter dominated Universe that dominated cosmological model building for much of the past 20 years does not correspond to the Universe in which we live. This has profound implications both for our understanding of dark matter, and also for our understanding of the future of the Universe. I review recent developments here and present best fits for the current, sometimes crazy, values of the major measured fundamental cosmological parameters. (Invited review talk, 9th International Workshop on Neutrino Telescopes, Venice, March 2001. Note: this is an updated version of an article prepared for the proceedings of IDM2000 in York, UK.)

Astrophysics

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The main problems that this paper attempts to solve include the following aspects:

1. **Geometric Structure and Expansion Rate of the Universe**:
- The paper explores whether the universe is flat and evaluates the measured values of the Hubble constant ($H_0$), which represents the expansion rate of the universe. Through different observational means, such as supernovae, gravitational lensing effects, and cosmic microwave background radiation (CMB), the author summarizes the current best estimates of $H_0$ and discusses the consistency and differences among these estimates.
- Formula: $H_0 = 68 \pm 3 \, \text{km/s/Mpc}$

2. **Matter Density and Dark Matter in the Universe**:
- The author discusses the total density of matter in the universe ($\Omega_{\text{M}}$), especially the abundance of dark matter. Through observations of large - scale structures (such as the formation and evolution of galaxy clusters) and anisotropies in the cosmic microwave background radiation, researchers have found that the matter density in the universe is not sufficient to make the universe reach the critical density ($\Omega = 1$).
- Formula: $\Omega_{\text{M}} h = 0.2 - 0.3$
- This means that unless the Hubble constant $h$ is very small, $\Omega_{\text{M}}$ is significantly less than 1.

3. **Contradiction between the Age of the Universe and the Age of Stars**:
- The author discusses the age of the oldest globular clusters estimated by star evolution models (such as the main - sequence star fitting technique) and compares it with the age of the universe estimated based on the Hubble constant and the expansion history of the universe. The study finds that if the universe is assumed to be matter - dominated and flat, the derived age of the universe may be inconsistent with the age of the oldest stars.
- Formula: $t_0=\frac{2}{3H_0}$ (for a matter - dominated flat universe)

4. **Existence of the Cosmological Constant or Dark Energy**:
- The paper points out that in order to reconcile the contradiction between the age of the universe and the age of stars and to explain the phenomenon of the accelerating expansion of the universe, an energy component with negative pressure, namely the cosmological constant ($\Lambda$) or dark energy, is introduced. This allows the universe to be a flat but dark - energy - dominated universe.
- Formula: $\Omega_{\text{M}}+\Omega_{\Lambda}=1$
- Here, $\Omega_{\Lambda}$ represents the density parameter of dark energy.

In summary, the main problems that this paper attempts to solve are: how to understand the geometric structure, expansion history, matter composition, and age of the universe in which we live, especially in the case of introducing dark energy, the inter - relationships and consistencies among these parameters.