Abstract:The space of local integrals of motion for the Sine-Gordon theory (the free fermion point) and the theory of free fermions in the light cone coordinates is investigated. Some important differences between the spaces of local integrals of motion of these theories are obtained. The equivalence is broken on the level of the integrals of motion between bosonic and fermionic theories (in the free fermion point). The integrals of motion are constracted without Quantum Inverse Scattering Method (QISM)and the additional quantum integrals of motion are obtaned. So the QISM is not absolutely complete.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The main problem that this paper attempts to solve is to explore the equivalence between the Sine - Gordon theory (at the free fermion point) and the free fermion theory. Specifically, the author studied the differences between these two theories in the space of local integrals of motion (IM) and found some important distinctions. These differences indicate that, at the quantum level, the Sine - Gordon theory (at the free fermion point) and the free fermion theory are not completely equivalent.
### Main Problem Summary:
1. **Equivalence Problem**:
- The author compared the Hamiltonian flux expressions of the Sine - Gordon theory (at the free fermion point) and the free fermion theory to explore their equivalence in the space of local integrals of motion.
- Research shows that there are important differences between these two theories in the space of local integrals of motion, and in particular, at the quantum level, this equivalence is broken.
2. **Construction of Quantum Integrals of Motion**:
- The author constructed new quantum integrals of motion in a way that does not rely on the Quantum Inverse Scattering Method (QISM).
- These newly constructed quantum integrals of motion reveal that the QISM is not entirely capable of giving all integrals of motion, thus questioning the completeness of the QISM.
3. **Mass Problem of the Sine - Gordon Theory**:
- At the free fermion point, the question of whether the Sine - Gordon theory is a mass theory remains unresolved. The author's research shows that the Sine - Gordon theory does not show equivalence with the free fermion theory at this point, so it cannot be simply considered a mass theory.
4. **New Infinite - Dimensional Symmetry**:
- At the free fermion point, the Sine - Gordon theory exhibits a new infinite - dimensional symmetry, similar to a reduced form of certain W1+∞ algebras. This symmetry may help to further understand the properties of this theory.
### Formula Summary:
- **Classical Integrals of Motion of Free Fermions**:
\[
I_n=\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} dx\left(\psi(x)\partial_x^n\psi^+(x)+h.c.\right),\quad n = 1, 2, 3,\ldots
\]
- **Quantum Integrals of Motion of the Sine - Gordon Theory**:
\[
i_2(x)=:(\partial\phi(x))^2:,\quad i_4(x)=:(\partial\phi(x))^4:+\frac{\alpha^4 - 6\alpha^2 + 4}{\alpha^2}:(\partial^2\phi(x))^2:
\]
\[
i_6(x)=:(\partial\phi(x))^6:+\frac{5(-\alpha^4 + 8\alpha^2 - 4)}{3\alpha^2}:(\partial\phi(x))^3\partial^3\phi(x):+\cdots
\]
- **Additional Integrals of Motion at the Free Fermion Point**:
\[
i_3(x)=:(\partial\phi(x))^3:,\quad i_5(x)=:(\partial\phi(x))^5:- 10:(\partial\phi(x))^3\partial^2\phi(x):+\cdots
\]
Through these formulas, the author shows the differences between the two theories in quantum integrals of motion and points out the incompleteness of the QISM.