R. Trotta,A. Riazuelo,R. Durrer
Abstract:Recently high quality data of the cosmic microwave background anisotropies have been published. In this work we study to which extent the cosmological parameters determined by using this data depend on assumptions about the initial conditions. We show that for generic initial conditions, not only the best fit values are very different but, and this is our main result, the allowed parameter range enlarges dramatically.
Astrophysics,General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology,High Energy Physics - Phenomenology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The main problem that this paper attempts to solve is to explore whether the determination of cosmological parameters depends on the assumptions of initial conditions. Specifically, the author studies how the estimation of cosmological parameters will change when mixed isocurvature perturbations are allowed to exist.
### Research Background
1. **Anisotropy of Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation (CMB)**: Since the COBE satellite first discovered the CMB anisotropy in 1992, great progress has been made in this field. In recent years, experiments such as BOOMERanG, DASI, and MAXIMA - 1 have provided high - precision data.
2. **Limitations of Traditional Methods**: Previous studies were mainly based on the assumption of initial fluctuations in a fixed model, that is, scale - invariant adiabatic perturbations. Although these models are widely used, they may overlook other types of initial conditions.
### Research Objectives
The author hopes to explore the following questions:
- **Influence of Initial Conditions**: How do different initial conditions affect the estimation of cosmological parameters?
- **Change in Parameter Range**: When the requirement for pure adiabatic initial conditions is relaxed, how will the allowed range of cosmological parameters change?
### Main Results
1. **Expansion of Parameter Range**: The research shows that for general initial conditions, not only are the best - fit values very different from those in the traditional adiabatic model, but also the allowed parameter range is significantly enlarged. This means that if we are not limited to the pure adiabatic model, the estimation of cosmological parameters will become more uncertain.
2. **Advantages of the Mixed Model**: By introducing mixed initial conditions (including adiabatic and isocurvature modes), the observational data can be better fitted. For example, under certain parameter selections, the mixed model can provide a better fit, while the pure adiabatic model cannot do this.
3. **Complexity of Parameter Space**: The author points out that the topological structure of the parameter space is very complex, with many local minima and degeneracy phenomena. This indicates that when performing parameter estimation relying only on CMB data, model assumptions need to be treated with caution.
### Conclusions
This paper emphasizes the importance of initial condition assumptions for the estimation of cosmological parameters and points out that allowing mixed initial conditions can greatly expand the parameter range. Therefore, the author suggests combining other independent cosmological measurement methods (such as the direct measurement of the Hubble constant and Big Bang nucleosynthesis) to limit the non - adiabatic components in the initial conditions, so as to better understand the state of the early universe.
### Formula Summary
- **Total Density Parameter**: \(\Omega_{\text{tot}}=\Omega_\Lambda+\Omega_m = 1\)
- **Dark Energy Density Parameter**: \(\Omega_\Lambda=\frac{\Lambda}{3H_0^2}\)
- **Matter Density Parameter**: \(\Omega_m=\Omega_c+\Omega_b\)
- **Hubble Parameter**: \(H_0 = 100h \, \text{km} \, \text{s}^{-1} \, \text{Mpc}^{-1}\)
- **Parameters \(h\) and \(\omega_b\)**: \(\omega_b=\Omega_bh^2\)
Through these formulas and analysis, the author shows the important influence of the diversity of initial conditions on the estimation of cosmological parameters.