Abstract:Virtual integration techniques focus on building architectural models of systems that can be analyzed early in the design cycle to try to lower cost, reduce risk, and improve quality of complex embedded systems. Given appropriate architectural descriptions, assume/guarantee contracts, and compositional reasoning rules, these techniques can be used to prove important safety properties about the architecture prior to system construction. For these proofs to be meaningful, each leaf-level component contract must be realizable; i.e., it is possible to construct a component such that for any input allowed by the contract assumptions, there is some output value that the component can produce that satisfies the contract guarantees. We have recently proposed (in [1]) a contract-based realizability checking algorithm for assume/guarantee contracts over infinite theories supported by SMT solvers such as linear integer/real arithmetic and uninterpreted functions. In that work, we used an SMT solver and an algorithm similar to k-induction to establish the realizability of a contract, and justified our approach via a hand proof. Given the central importance of realizability to our virtual integration approach, we wanted additional confidence that our approach was sound. This paper describes a complete formalization of the approach in the Coq proof and specification language. During formalization, we found several small mistakes and missing assumptions in our reasoning. Although these did not compromise the correctness of the algorithm used in the checking tools, they point to the value of machine-checked formalization. In addition, we believe this is the first machine-checked formalization for a realizability algorithm.

Checking Properties within Fairness and Behavior Abstractions

Model Checking with Fairness Assumptions Using Pat

Verify LTL with Fairness Assumptions Efficiently.

Model Checking Partial Fair State Spaces With 3-Valued Fair Ctl

FairSquare: probabilistic verification of program fairness

Automated Software Verification of Hyperliveness

Overcoming Memory Weakness with Unified Fairness

A Probabilistic Model for Parametric Fairness in Isabelle/HOL ?

Description and Analysis of Fairness on Temporal Logic of Actions

On the refinement of liveness properties of distributed systems

What Is Fairness? On the Role of Protected Attributes and Fictitious Worlds

Probabilistic verification of fairness properties via concentration

How is the AI Perceived when It Behaves (Un)fairly?

Software Verification of Hyperproperties Beyond k-Safety

Partial State Spaces Model Checking CTL with Fairness Constraints

Evaluating AI Group Fairness: a Fuzzy Logic Perspective

Proving Program Properties as First-Order Satisfiability

Escaping the Impossibility of Fairness: From Formal to Substantive Algorithmic Fairness

Fair Ambients

Machine-Checked Proofs For Realizability Checking Algorithms

Hyperproperty Verification as CHC Satisfiability