Moral Dilemmas Regarding Physical Restraints in Intensive Care Units: Understanding Autonomy, Beneficence, Non-Maleficence and Justice in the Use of Physical Restraints
Junya Zhou,Qingzhu Qin,Songge Chen,Hongmei Zhang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/jmdh.s455910
2024-04-12
Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare
Abstract:Junya Zhou, 1 Qingzhu Qin, 1 Songge Chen, 1 Hongmei Zhang 2 1 Department of Cardiology, Henan Provincial Key Medicine Laboratory of Nursing, Henan Provincial People's Hospital; Zhengzhou University People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, Henan, 450003, People's Republic of China; 2 Department of Nursing, Henan Provincial Key Medicine Laboratory of Nursing, Henan Provincial People's Hospital; Zhengzhou University People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, Henan, 450003, People's Republic of China Correspondence: Hongmei Zhang, Department of Nursing, Henan Provincial Key Medicine Laboratory of Nursing, Henan Provincial People's Hospital; Zhengzhou University People's Hospital, No. 7 Weiwu Road, Zhengzhou, Henan, 450003, People's Republic of China, Tel +86 15699930876, Email In intensive care units, patients are often restrained to ensure their safety, with physical restraints being the most commonly used method. However, physical restraints compromises the patient's freedom, health and comfort, and nurses often face moral dilemmas when deciding whether to use physical restraints. This article examines physical restraints through the four universal principles of autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence and justice. Through these principles, the authors will critically explore whether the physical restraints of patients by nurses is ethical in practice and what moral issues exist. This paper also explores conflicts and moral dilemmas for nurses in this context. Finally, suggestions are made on changes to education and clinical practice. Keywords: physical restraints, ethical dilemmas, ethics The moral issues are naturally more focused in human-centred care. 1 Patients are often vulnerable and require professional help and care, and care involves close interaction with them. 2 Complex situations arise when caring for patients, and nurses have difficulty making decisions, often facing the greatest legal and ethical responsibilities. 2 Many patients in intensive care units (ICUs) experience hallucinations, delirium and agitation. 3 Furthermore, they may exhibit abnormal behaviours such as aggression, tube pulling, trying to get out of bed, throwing objects and hurting themselves and others. 4 Therefore, intensive care nurses may use restraints to ensure patient safety. Physical restraints avoid the physical damage caused by the use of chemical restraints and do not require caregivers to constantly hold patients down to control limb movements. This is therefore a commonly used method in ICUs, 5 with approximately one-third of patients in ICUs requiring physical restraints. 6 The definition of physical restraints is the use of any manual technique, such as the use of physical force, materials or equipment, to limit the mobility of the arms, legs, body or head to remove or reduce a patient's free movement. These techniques harm the patient's freedom, health and comfort. 7 As a result, most intensive care nurses face moral dilemmas when deciding whether to use physical restraints. 8 Not using physical restraints may cause physical and mental damage to patients, but using physical restraints is often against the patient's wishes. 2 Nurses, as the implementer, usually experience moral dilemmas over using physical restraints because they need to weigh patient autonomy against patient safety. 2 The moral dilemmas faced by nursing staff can have a significant impact on the quality of patient care. Some studies have focused on factors that influence the moral issue of nurses, as well as experiences of physical restraints. 9,10 These studies indicate that even if nurses guide physical restraints as necessary, they still face moral issue. Therefore, this paper examines the use of physical restraints in medical settings through the four universal principles of ethics of autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence and justice to help the nursing profession. Through these principles, the author will critically explore whether the use of physical restraints by nurses is ethical in practice and what moral issues exist. This paper also explores the conflicts and moral dilemmas that nurses face in mechanical restraints. Moreover, the nurse, as a moral agent in ethical decision-making, will be critically discussed. Patient consent and nurse decision-making will be incorporated into an analysis of care ethics. Finally, suggestions are made on changes to education and clinical practice. This study searched both Chinese (CNKI) and English databases (Pubmed, NCBI), with keywords such as nursing, nurse, physical constraints, and moral dilemmas. The retrieved literature was screened based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. Inclusion criteria: 1) The theme is the moral dilemma of nu -Abstract Truncated-
health care sciences & services