Abstract:A number of hydrological studies have proven the superior prediction performance of hybrid models coupled with data preprocessing techniques. However, many studies first decompose the entire data series into components and later divide each component into calibration and validation datasets to establish models, which sends some amount of future information into the decomposition and reconstruction processes. As a consequence, the resulting components used to forecast the value of a particular moment are computed using information from future values, which are not available at that particular moment in a forecasting exercise. Since most papers don't present their model framework in detail, it is difficult to identify whether they are performing a real forecast or not. Even though several other papers have explicitly stated which experiment they are performing, a comparison between results in the hindcast and forecast experiments is still missing. Therefore, it is necessary to investigate and compare the performance of these hybrid models in the two experiments in order to estimate whether they are suitable for real forecasting. With the combination of three preprocessing techniques, such as wavelet analysis (WA), empirical mode decomposition (EMD) and singular spectrum analysis (SSA), and two modeling methods (i.e. ANN model and ARMA model), six hybrid models are developed in this study, including WA-ANN, WA-ARMA, EMD-ANN, EMD-ARMA, SSA-ANN and SSA-ARMA. Preprocessing techniques are used to decompose the data series into sub-series, and then these sub-series are modeled using ANN and ARMA models. These models are examined in hindcasting and forecasting of the monthly streamflow of two sites in the Yangtze River of China. The results of this study indicate that the six hybrid models perform better in the hindcast experiment compared with the original ANN and ARMA models, while the hybrid models in the forecast experiment perform worse than the original models and the performances of WA-based and EMD-based models vary largely across different extension methods. It can be concluded that the hybrid models are not suitable for monthly streamflow forecasting in this study. New extension methods and modified preprocessing techniques can improve the prediction performance of these hybrid models in forecast experiments. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Univariate streamflow forecasting using commonly used data-driven models: literature review and case study

Assessing Different Roles of Baseflow and Surface Runoff for Long-Term Streamflow Forecasting in Southeastern China

A Comparative Study of Models for Short-Term Streamflow Forecasting with Emphasis on Wavelet-Based Approach

Evaluating a Coupled Discrete Wavelet Transform and Support Vector Regression for Daily and Monthly Streamflow Forecasting

Long‐term Streamflow Forecasting Using Artificial Neural Network Based on Preprocessing Technique

A comparative study of data-driven models for runoff, sediment, and nitrate forecasting

Evaluation of Short-Term Streamflow Prediction Methods in Urban River Basins

New Fuzzy Neural Network-Markov Model And Application In Mid- To Long-Term Runoff Forecast

A Comparative Study on Forecasting of Long-term Daily Streamflow using ANN, ANFIS, BiLSTM and CNN-GRU-LSTM

A Comparative Assessment of Artificial Neural Network, Generalized Regression Neural Network, Least-Square Support Vector Regression, and K-Nearest Neighbor Regression for Monthly Streamflow Forecasting in Linear and Nonlinear Conditions

Short-term Water Level Prediction Using Different Artificial Intelligent Models

Data Pre-Analysis and Ensemble of Various Artificial Neural Networks for Monthly Streamflow Forecasting

Streamflow Forecasting Using Empirical Wavelet Transform and Artificial Neural Networks

Hybrid Data-Driven Models for Hydrological Simulation and Projection on the Catchment Scale

Are Hybrid Models Integrated with Data Preprocessing Techniques Suitable for Monthly Streamflow Forecasting? Some Experiment Evidences

Estimation of data-driven streamflow predicting models using machine learning methods

Performance evaluation of ML techniques in hydrologic studies: Comparing streamflow simulated by SWAT, GR4J, and state-of-the-art ML-based models

Evaluating the performances of several artificial intelligence methods in forecasting daily streamflow time series for sustainable water resources management

Streamflow forecasting by modeling the rainfall–streamflow relationship using artificial neural networks

Guidance on the construction and selection of relatively simple to complex data-driven models for multi-task streamflow forecasting

Mid-short-term Daily Runoff Forecasting by ANNs and Multiple Process-Based Hydrological Models