Abstract:We use optimal estimation (OE) to quantify methane fluxes based on total column CH 4 data from the Greenhouse Gases Observing Satellite (GOSAT) and the GEOS-Chem global chemistry transport model. We then project these fluxes to emissions by sector at 1 ∘ resolution and then to each country using a new Bayesian algorithm that accounts for prior and posterior uncertainties in the methane emissions. These estimates are intended as a pilot dataset for the global stock take in support of the Paris Agreement. However, differences between the emissions reported here and widely used bottom-up inventories should be used as a starting point for further research because of potential systematic errors of these satellite-based emissions estimates. We find that agricultural and waste emissions are ∼ 263 ± 24 Tg CH 4 yr −1 , anthropogenic fossil emissions are 82 ± 12 Tg CH 4 yr −1 , and natural wetland/aquatic emissions are 180 ± 10 Tg CH 4 yr −1 . These estimates are consistent with previous inversions based on GOSAT data and the GEOS-Chem model. In addition, anthropogenic fossil estimates are consistent with those reported to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (80.4 Tg CH 4 yr −1 for 2019). Alternative priors can be easily tested with our new Bayesian approach (also known as prior swapping) to determine their impact on posterior emissions estimates. We use this approach by swapping to priors that include much larger aquatic emissions and fossil emissions (based on isotopic evidence) and find little impact on our posterior fluxes. This indicates that these alternative inventories are inconsistent with our remote sensing estimates and also that the posteriors reported here are due to the observing and flux inversion system and not uncertainties in the prior inventories. We find that total emissions for approximately 57 countries can be resolved with this observing system based on the degrees-of-freedom for signal metric (DOFS > 1.0) that can be calculated with our Bayesian flux estimation approach. Below a DOFS of 0.5, estimates for country total emissions are more weighted to our choice of prior inventories. The top five emitting countries (Brazil, China, India, Russia, USA) emit about half of the global anthropogenic budget, similar to our choice of prior emissions but with the posterior emissions shifted towards the agricultural sector and less towards fossil emissions, consistent with our global posterior results. Our results suggest remote-sensing-based estimates of methane emissions can be substantially different (although within uncertainty) than bottom-up inventories, isotopic evidence, or estimates based on sparse in situ data, indicating a need for further studies reconciling these different approaches for quantifying the methane budget. Higher-resolution fluxes calculated from upcoming satellite or aircraft data such as the Tropospheric Monitoring Instrument (TROPOMI) and those in formulation such as the Copernicus CO 2 M, MethaneSat, or Carbon Mapper can be incorporated into our Bayesian estimation framework for the purpose of reducing uncertainty and improving the spatial resolution and sectoral attribution of subsequent methane emissions estimates.

Analysis of spatially distributed enteric methane emissions from cattle across the geo-climatic regions of Mexico and uncertainty assessment

Revisiting Enteric Methane Emissions from Domestic Ruminants and Their Δ13cch4 Source Signature.

A 130‐year Global Inventory of Methane Emissions from Livestock: Trends, Patterns, and Drivers

Estimating Methane Emissions from Mexican Wetlands with Multiple Earth System Models

Inventory of Methane Emissions from Livestock in China from 1980 to 2013

A Greenhouse Gas Budget for Mexico During 2000–2019

Assessment of uncertainties in greenhouse gas emission profiles of livestock sectors in Africa, Latin America and Europe

Prediction of enteric methane emissions from cattle

Prediction of enteric methane production and yield in sheep using a Latin America and Caribbean database

Methane emissions in the United States, Canada, and Mexico: Evaluation of national methane emission inventories and sectoral trends by inverse analysis of in situ (GLOBALVIEWplus CH&lt;sub&gt;4&lt;/sub&gt; ObsPack) and satellite (GOSAT) atmospheric observations

Unravelling a large methane emission discrepancy in Mexico using satellite observations

Methane emissions in the United States, Canada, and Mexico: evaluation of national methane emission inventories and 2010–2017 sectoral trends by inverse analysis of in situ (GLOBALVIEWplus CH<sub>4</sub> ObsPack) and satellite (GOSAT) atmospheric observations

Methane emissions in the United States, Canada, and Mexico: Evaluation of national methane emission inventories and sectoral trends by inverse analysis of in situ (GLOBALVIEWplus CH4 ObsPack) and satellite (GOSAT) atmospheric observations

Magnitude and Uncertainty of Nitrous Oxide Emissions from North America Based on Bottom‐Up and Top‐Down Approaches: Informing Future Research and National Inventories

Methane Emissions in the United States, Canada, and Mexico: Evaluation of National Methane Emission Inventories and 2010–2017 Sectoral Trends by Inverse Analysis of in Situ (globalviewplus CH4 ObsPack) and Satellite (GOSAT) Atmospheric Observations

The 2019 methane budget and uncertainties at 1° resolution and each country through Bayesian integration Of GOSAT total column methane data and a priori inventory estimates

Revised methane emissions factors and spatially distributed annual carbon fluxes for global livestock

Prediction of enteric methane production, yield, and intensity in dairy cattle using an intercontinental database

Constructing a measurement-based spatially explicit inventory of US oil and gas methane emissions

The Key Role of Production Efficiency Changes in Livestock Methane Emission Mitigation

Potential Underestimate in Reported Bottom-up Methane Emissions from Oil and Gas Operations in the Delaware Basin