Abstract:The anatomical complexity of brachial plexus injury requires specialized in-depth diagnostics. The clinical examination should include clinical neurophysiology tests, especially with reference to the proximal part, with innovative devices used as sources of precise functional diagnostics. However, the principles and clinical usefulness of this technique are not fully described. The aim of this study was to reinvestigate the clinical usefulness of motor evoked potential (MEP) induced by a magnetic field applied over the vertebrae and at Erb's point to assess the neural transmission of brachial plexus motor fibers. Seventy-five volunteer subjects were randomly chosen to participate in the research. The clinical studies included an evaluation of the upper extremity sensory perception in dermatomes C5–C8 based on von Frey's tactile monofilament method, and proximal and distal muscle strength by Lovett's scale. Finally, 42 healthy people met the inclusion criteria. Magnetic and electrical stimuli were applied to assess the motor function of the peripheral nerves of the upper extremity and magnetic stimulus was applied to study the neural transmission from the C5–C8 spinal roots. The parameters of compound muscle action potential (CMAP) recorded during electroneurography and MEP induced by magnetic stimulation were analyzed. Because the conduction parameters for the groups of women and men were comparable, the final statistical analysis covered 84 tests. The parameters of the potentials generated by electrical stimulus were comparable to those of the potentials induced by magnetic impulse at Erb's point. The amplitude of the CMAP was significantly higher following electrical stimulation than that of the MEP following magnetic stimulation for all the examined nerves, in the range of 3–7%. The differences in the potential latency values evaluated in CMAP and MEP did not exceed 5%. The results show a significantly higher amplitude of potentials after stimulation of the cervical roots compared to potentials evoked at Erb's point (C5, C6 level). At the C8 level, the amplitude was lower than the potentials evoked at Erb's point, varying in the range of 9–16%. We conclude that magnetic field stimulation enables the recording of the supramaximal potential, similar to that evoked by an electric impulse, which is a novel result. Both types of excitation can be used interchangeably during an examination, which is essential for clinical application. Magnetic stimulation was painless in comparison with electrical stimulation according to the results of a pain visual analog scale (3 vs. 5.5 on average). MEP studies with advanced sensor technology allow evaluation of the proximal part of the peripheral motor pathway (between the cervical root level and Erb's point, and via trunks of the brachial plexus to the target muscles) following the application of stimulus over the vertebrae.

Inter-session reliability of magnetic nerve stimulation and Within-Session comparison to electrical nerve stimulation in evaluating neuromuscular function of knee extensor muscles

Jitter Analysis with Concentric Needle Electrodes in the Extensor Digitorum Communis for the Diagnosis of Myasthenia Gravis: a Pilot Study

Repetitive magnetic nerve stimulation: technical considerations and clinical use in the assessment of neuromuscular transmission

Reliability of a method to assess corticomotor excitability of lower limb muscles using a normalized EMG motor thresholding procedure

Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation Does Not Influence Spinal Excitability in Multiple Sclerosis Patients

Acceptability and feasibility of magnetic femoral nerve stimulation in older, functionally impaired patients

Electrical stimulation for testing neuromuscular function: from sport to pathology

Neurophysiological Evaluation of Neural Transmission in Brachial Plexus Motor Fibers with the Use of Magnetic versus Electrical Stimuli

Assessment of calf muscle fatigue during submaximal exercise using transcranial magnetic stimulation versus transcutaneous motor nerve stimulation

Different Muscles, Lower Cutoff Values: Does it Truly Improve the Diagnostic Sensitivity of Repetitive Nerve Stimulation in Myasthenia Gravis?

Reliability of transcranial magnetic stimulation-evoked responses on knee extensor muscles during cycling

Dynamic MR imaging of the skeletal muscle in young and senior volunteers during minimal synchronized neuromuscular electrical stimulation

On the reliability of motor evoked potentials in hand muscles of healthy adults: a systematic review

Sensory Stimulation of the Triceps Surae Muscle Complex Modulates Spinal Reflex Responses—A Comparison between Tapotement Massage and Repetitive Peripheral Magnetic Stimulation (rPMS)

Evaluation of the effectiveness of electrical muscle stimulation on human calf muscles via frequency difference electrical impedance tomography

A comparative study of repetitive nerve stimulation and single-fiber electromyography neuromuscular junction disturbance in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis patients

Quantitative evaluation of factors influencing the 3 Hz repetitive nerve stimulation test in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

Modulation of the Corticomotor Excitability by Repetitive Peripheral Magnetic Stimulation on the Median Nerve in Healthy Subjects

[Comparison of Multiple Point Stimulation and Incremental Stimulation in Patients with Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis].

Electrophysiological characteristics of patients with myasthenia gravis