Variation in forest root image annotation by experts, novices, and AI

Grace Handy,Imogen Carter,A. Rob Mackenzie,Adriane Esquivel-Muelbert,Abraham George Smith,Daniela Yaffar,Joanne Childs,Marie Arnaud
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13007-024-01279-z
IF: 5.827
2024-10-03
Plant Methods
Abstract:The manual study of root dynamics using images requires huge investments of time and resources and is prone to previously poorly quantified annotator bias. Artificial intelligence (AI) image-processing tools have been successful in overcoming limitations of manual annotation in homogeneous soils, but their efficiency and accuracy is yet to be widely tested on less homogenous, non-agricultural soil profiles, e.g., that of forests, from which data on root dynamics are key to understanding the carbon cycle. Here, we quantify variance in root length measured by human annotators with varying experience levels. We evaluate the application of a convolutional neural network (CNN) model, trained on a software accessible to researchers without a machine learning background, on a heterogeneous minirhizotron image dataset taken in a multispecies, mature, deciduous temperate forest.
plant sciences,biochemical research methods
What problem does this paper attempt to address?