Abstract:PurposeThe purpose of this research is to explore how an innovation organization's orientation toward the digital economy influences its position within R&D networks. By using institutional theory, the study aims to forecast market changes and understand how organizations can navigate the digital economy to secure essential resources and minimize dependencies.Design/methodology/approachThis study employs a longitudinal panel dataset with 11,763 entries from 1995 to 2018, covering strategic emerging industries in China to analyze the impact of digital economy orientation on R&D networks. Utilizing advanced statistical models, it assesses the role of the legal environment as a moderator. This methodological approach facilitates a robust examination of the nexus between digital orientation and network dynamics within the context of institutional theory.FindingsThe study reveals that an organization's digital economy orientation enhances its centrality in R&D networks but reduces its control over structural holes. The legal environment negatively moderates the impact of digital economy orientation on network centrality, while positively influencing the relationship with network structural holes. These findings offer new insights into how institutional forces shape the strategic positioning of organizations in R&D collaborations.Originality/valueThis research offers a fresh perspective on the digital economy's impact on R&D networks, particularly in the Industry-University-Research (IUR) context. It extends the discourse by integrating institutional theory to elucidate the adaptation of R&D networks in the digital era. By identifying the legal environment as a moderator, the study provides a nuanced understanding of the strategic alignment within networks influenced by digital advancements. The unique focus on China's R&D networks presents a valuable contribution to the global discussion on digital integration and innovation ecosystems, highlighting the intersection of policy, academia, and industry in shaping research and development trajectories.

The Relevance of the Institutional Underpinnings of Porter's Five Forces Framework to Emerging Economies: An Epistemological Analysis

The Relevance of Porter's Five Forces in Today's Innovative and Changing Business Environment

How Does Institutional Theory Illuminate the Influence of the Digital Economy on R&D Networks?

Re-examining the Relevance of Michael Porter’s ‘Five Forces Framework’: Business Strategy and Competitiveness in the Contemporary Globalised World

Fathoming Porter's five forces model in the internet era

Using Porter's Five Forces analysis to drive strategy

How Do Upper Echelons Perceive Porter's Five Forces? Evidence From Strategic Entrepreneurship in China

How Do Upper Echelons Perceive Porter’s Five Forces? Evidence From Strategic Entrepreneurship in China

Rethinking and reinventing Michael Porter's five forces model

MNE Microfoundations and Routines for Building a Legitimate and Sustainable Position in Emerging Markets

How Do Linking, Leveraging and Learning Capabilities Influence the Entry Mode Choice for Multinational Firms from Emerging Markets?

Arriving at a strategic theory of the firm

The five competitive forces that shape strategy

Formal institutional context in global strategy research: A layer cake perspective

An institution-based view of international business strategy: a focus on emerging economies

Assessing the industry using Porter's five forces

A co-evolution perspective of EMNE internationalization and institutions: An integrative framework of 5Cs

Porter's Five Forces in the German railway industry

When foreignness becomes a liability: the effects of flawed institutional environments on foreign versus domestic firm performance in emerging markets

Innovation in and from emerging economies: New insights and lessons for international business research