Abstract:<section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="block__title">Policy Points</h3><ul class="unordered-list"><li>Telehealth has many potential advantages during an infectious disease outbreak such as the COVID-19 pandemic, and the COVID-19 pandemic has accelerated the shift to telehealth as a prominent care delivery mode.</li><li>Not all health care providers and patients are equally ready to take part in the telehealth revolution, which raises concerns for health equity during and after the COVID-19 pandemic.</li><li>Without proactive efforts to address both patient- and provider-related digital barriers associated with socioeconomic status, the wide-scale implementation of telehealth amid COVID-19 may reinforce disparities in health access in already marginalized and underserved communities.</li><li>To ensure greater telehealth equity, policy changes should address barriers faced overwhelmingly by marginalized patient populations and those who serve them.</li></ul></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Context</h3><p>The COVID-19 pandemic has catalyzed fundamental shifts across the US health care delivery system, including a rapid transition to telehealth. Telehealth has many potential advantages, including maintaining critical access to care while keeping both patients and providers safe from unnecessary exposure to the coronavirus. However, not all health care providers and patients are equally ready to take part in this digital revolution, which raises concerns for health equity during and after the COVID-19 pandemic.</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Methods</h3><p>The study analyzed data about small primary care practices' telehealth use and barriers to telehealth use collected from rapid-response surveys administered by the New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene's Bureau of Equitable Health Systems and New York University from mid-April through mid-June 2020 as part of the city's efforts to understand how primary care practices were responding to the COVID-19 pandemic following New York State's stay-at-home order on March 22. We focused on small primary care practices because they represent 40% of primary care providers and are disproportionately located in low-income, minority or immigrant areas that were more severely impacted by COVID-19. To examine whether telehealth use and barriers differed based on the socioeconomic characteristics of the communities served by these practices, we used the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Social Vulnerability Index (SVI) to stratify respondents as being in high-SVI or low-SVI areas. We then characterized respondents' telehealth use and barriers to adoption by using means and proportions with 95% confidence intervals. In addition to a primary analysis using pooled data across the five waves of the survey, we performed sensitivity analyses using data from respondents who only took one survey, first wave only, and the last two waves only.</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Findings</h3><p>While all providers rapidly shifted to telehealth, there were differences based on community characteristics in both the primary mode of telehealth used and the types of barriers experienced by providers. Providers in high-SVI areas were almost twice as likely as providers in low-SVI areas to use telephones as their primary telehealth modality (41.7% vs 23.8%; <i>P</i> <.001). The opposite was true for video, which was used as the primary telehealth modality by 18.7% of providers in high-SVI areas and 33.7% of providers in low-SVI areas (<i>P</i> <0.001). Providers in high-SVI areas also faced more patient-related barriers and fewer provider-related barriers than those in low-SVI areas. </p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Conclusions</h3><p>Between April and June 2020, telehealth became a prominent mode of primary care delivery in New York City. However, the transition to telehealth did not unfold in the same manner across communities. To ensure greater telehealth equity, policy changes should address barriers faced overwhelmingly by marginalized patient populations and those who serve them.</p></section>

Primary Care Telemedicine and Care Continuity: Implications for Timeliness and Short-term Follow-up Healthcare

Healthcare Utilization Differences Among Primary Care Patients Using Telemedicine in the Veterans Health Administration: a Retrospective Cohort Study

Telemedicine in Primary Care: Lessons Learned About Implementing Health Care Innovations During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Primary care telemedicine during the COVID-19 pandemic: patient’s choice of video versus telephone visit

Telemedicine and time management in primary care

Reducing no-show visits and disparities in access: The impact of telemedicine

Primary Care Telehealth Initiation and Engagement Among Veterans at High Risk, 2019-2022

An After-Hours Telemedicine Urgent Care Service May Not Improve Access to Care for Underserved Populations

Telemedicine and patient-centered care: The perspective of primary-care physicians

Differences in Primary Care Follow-up After Acute Care Discharge Within and Across Health Systems: a Retrospective Cohort Study

Rapid Transition to Telehealth and the Digital Divide: Implications for Primary Care Access and Equity in a Post‐COVID Era

Experiences with telemedicine-based follow-up of chronic conditions: the views of patients and health personnel enrolled in a pragmatic randomized controlled trial

Delivering Urgent Care Using Telemedicine: Insights from Experienced Clinicians at Academic Medical Centers

Accuracy of Telehealth Visits for Acute Care Needs in Family Medicine

Post-hospitalization transitions: Examining the effects of timing of primary care provider follow-up

Striving toward team-based continuity: provision of same-day access and continuity in academic primary care clinics

Primary care providers' perceptions of mobile store-and-forward teledermatology

Diagnosis, access and outcomes: Update of a systematic review of telemedicine services

Downstream Emergency Department and Hospital Utilization Comparably Low Following In-Person Versus Telemedicine Primary Care for High-Risk Conditions

Telemedicine Compared to Office-Based Care of Patients With Cardiac Symptoms: Treatment and Outcomes

Patient Characteristics Associated With Telemedicine Access for Primary and Specialty Ambulatory Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic